Exactly my thought! I have a deaf friend, will have to ask
EDIT - someone played a joke on the idiot commentators.
http://www.auslan.org.au/dictionary/words/clapping-1.html?flavour=full
What's the Auslan sign for "Jazz-hands"?
Wasn't it Marto? That would be taking candy from a baby if it was.
.
What's the deal with the highlanders only have 14?
The maul is destroying the Clan, but the Brumbies are joining it in front of Pocock every time - I'm not sure that's on. It seems to be an accepted thing these days (they are by no means the only offenders!), but it's obstruction if they join in front, no?
I commented on Twitter that the Brumbies forwards were more creative and cohesive in attack with ball in hand than the backs. Not to mention damaging. You could argue the backs didn't have to do much with the forwards dominating so much. I think much is down to the ramshackle backline they're having to field, so I'm not going to judge too harshly. It would be concerning if the pack was being matched.The Brumbies were totally dominant in the forwards for the first half. Much more even in the second 40.
I am concerned that the Brumbies are so toothless in attack. The maul (illegalities aside) was the only sure weapon the Brumbies had. That and Pocock who set up Speight's try also for 3 tries and 1 assist, plus turnovers and effective run metres. A pretty big marker has been laid down for Hooper and Gill in that performance. Back to what I was saying, the Brumbies were pedestrian apart from that. It was pass and hit up endlessly. There were so few plays where there was even a second option to pass to. I know To'omua was the focus for the Brumbies attacking plays, but it is a big issue that with such forward dominance they could put together a backline move.
It was such an issue even Kafer mentioned that Bernie should be concerned about it.
<snip>
In terms of HJ calling them Otago. I think he is secretly born and bred in Dunedin and hates southland.
I commented on Twitter that the Brumbies forwards were more creative and cohesive in attack with ball in hand than the backs. Not to mention damaging. You could argue the backs didn't have to do much with the forwards dominating so much. I think much is down to the ramshackle backline they're having to field, so I'm not going to judge too harshly. It would be concerning if the pack was being matched.
At the end of the day, it was a very good Brumbies win, but the Highlanders' might be ruing leaving out such an important cadre of players.