Bruce Ross
Ken Catchpole (46)
Thanks for giving us your point of view RH. I think the opinion of the head of Referees appointed by the IRB carries a little more weight than yours though.
This is what is technically known as the "argument from authority"; in this instance the claim being that someone by reason of their position is an expert and that therefore their opinion must necessarily carry " a little more weight" than someone judged to be non-expert.
Those of a sceptical or cynical predisposition discover quite early in life that among the ranks of the powerful there is at least as great a distribution of fools and incompetents as among the ranks of the unwashed. I am not making any judgement as to the competence of Lyndon Bray - my general position being that referees should be regarded as random decision generators - although I think that Paddy O'Brien helps to demonstrate my point.
Of course in years to come this particular classification might become known as the "argument from Matthew Burke".