Ignoto
Peter Sullivan (51)
You should have a look where ASIC focuses their relatively modest resources.
This really strikes me as something they wouldn't go near. There aren't consumers involved and getting ripped off, and it doesn't concern an AFSL or phoenix activities.
Ahhh the dismissal I had over the board/CEO was just to highlight there were other issues. ASIC would no doubt be able to get involved due to the breaches of director's duties don't you think?
Why do you think the Auditor General would classify the waiver as an anomaly? After all, the minister acted well within their power to not force the fee on the Brumbies. The anomaly is, did the Brumbies incorporate this in their sale price? If they did, that's an extra $7million on the sale price of $11m. So, did the building and land only get valued at $4million?
When you take that PLUS the fact the Government gave the Brumbies an extra $5-6million it raises questions on why the Government did that when the Brumbies didn't include the waiver fee reduction in their sale price.
While it's getting into conspiracy territory
http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/act...s-his-role-in-manuka-bid-20160428-goh0bb.html
Former Labor deputy chief minister David Lamont has dismissed concerns about his involvement in plans to redevelop Manuka Oval
He worked with the Brumbies on the controversial sale of the club's Griffith headquarters before the Brumbies move to a new sports hub at the University of Canberra. He has also been engaged by the university as a project adviser for its campus development, putting him on two sides of a complex commercial deal