Crawford is a good player, rangy and big enough - though not most likely not 103 kgs as the ABC had him last week. He's been playing fullback for Norths but, though he played there some in Colts, he's not a good enough footie player yet to play there in senior rugby IMO. He's really a winger who could become a fullback at the Super level after training full time in the Brumbies stable - and he has a bit of toe which is what the Brumbies need.
He could turn out OK but I would have grabbed somebody like Aidan Toua instead. He is good now.
It was interesting to listen to Jake White on the Rugby Show on Thursday night when he said that the Brumbies had too many players who were the same. It was good to hear somebody cut through the crap, as Rea did in South Africa on another matter.
Between Gandalf and Friend they recruited too many people who could play 10, 12 and 13, 3 specialist fetchers, yet not enough back 3 players who had pace, nor enough 2nd rowers with grunt. One has mentioned these deficiencies before.
Australia has a small pool of professional players yet no semi-professional competition to provide a bridge between amateur and pro rugby, and to assess which new players deserve a precious Super spot.
Without that Oz rugby needs to do things a lot smarter than they have before to man 5 Super teams, yet they seem to be doing things dumber. I can't remember reading anything official about the requirement for Oz Super teams to reduce the number of contracted players to 30, but if it is so, it will help a few years down the track if they pick the right ones. Some good players will have to move.
I wouldn't count on teams getting their mixes right with fewer contracted players in the stable, but they will have to if they want to be competitive.