Quick Hands
David Wilson (68)
It could be looked at like that. Or as the top level of domestic rugby.
But what it's consistently referred to as is the 3rd tier. Why would anyone pay to see something promoted as third level? You're not even giving yourself a chance calling it that.
The thing is the same theory is true of the 2nd level. Thankfully the ARU and rugby media don't consistently refer to Super Rugby as 2nd tier.
It's the only sporting competition anywhere that I know, in any sport which refers to itself as a tier. It's the sort of expression backroom bureaucrats might use, but I know of no-one in the real world who would use the term for anything.