Derpus
Nathan Sharpe (72)
Well yea, no shit, it’s better value in that respect
What I’m saying is for someone who is a multi sport fan, which is the majority of people, it’s an added cost
Almost every other sport is accessible freely.
Well yea, no shit, it’s better value in that respect
What I’m saying is for someone who is a multi sport fan, which is the majority of people, it’s an added cost
Almost every other sport is accessible freely.
Last time Channel 9 had the rugby rights they had Ray Hadley commentating games who is hopeless and knows next to nothing about rugby. I'd be careful what you wish for there.
Phil Kearns isn't the game caller so that's not really the comparison to make. That's Greg Clark.
My point was purely around the suggestion that a move to another broadcaster shouldn't be done on the basis of thinking that it will result in the commentators improving. It very possibly won't.
Ah yes. Because the current commentary team have demonstrated a deep understanding of the modern day game of rugby. My favorite is around scrum time, when they call on the expert in Kearns who tells us they get up to tricks in the front row and the tight 5 push really hard.
I would rather Ray Hadley call the game than Kearns. You know why? Because the bloke doesn't just sit there speaking a monotone and tries to at least make a boring passage audibly exciting.
Hopefully, 9 could grab Bray and Burke - infinitely better
It would be great if they went for a younger fresher vibe with Swain, Maloney, Ransome and maybe some younger ex players.
Hoiles and Mitchel were fun
1980’s Gordon Bray? Or present day senile Gordon Bray?
Hoiles and Mitchel were fun
Drew may be available, but Hoiles is supposed to be off coaching in the US?
Are these our only options? can't we just give someone new a twirl.