Slim 293
Stirling Mortlock (74)
RA already had a Chief Business Officer and a Chief Commercial Officer and board members who’d been around the broadcast rights issues before. And a $850,000 pa plus bonuses CEO with experience of NRL media dealings. But they needed ‘$1m media deal makers’ as consultants. Righto.
And they RA were facing very tight financial constraints already, as a business.
Then they still hire high cost media advisors.
Who seemingly join in with RA to endorse in 2019 Super Rugby 2021 + model (umm, merely a new version of insanity).
Then Optus might arrive..but later it (CEO Optus Sports) says itself it was never really there.
Then you say ‘they all do it’ like that’s justification solely through repetitive commonality as though that’s a great rationale - really?
Then the new Chair of NRL handles the v tough COVID media deal landscape and pretty much sorts it all out rather well himself in 1-2 months. No experts in sight.
And you say ‘they all need expensive media consultants so RA needed them too’.
But you don’t justify that statement. Or explain, given all above, why? Or quote the precise facts re how ‘all other codes have done just like RA did’.
IMO, your own bias is clear. Just different to Halloran’s is all.
I'm just going to focus on this part of your post for now...........
You kind of dismiss the idea that RA should hire media rights consultants, because board members been involved in these deals before, even though they would've engaged with media rights consultants on those bids because it's common practice used by sports organisations, including the NRL who brought them in to help negotiate their last broadcast deal.
You assume they were a high cost............. do you know the general cost of engaging these consultants?
You infer they were endorsing the Super Rugby model, even though that wouldn't have been their job at all - the Super Rugby model having already been agreed to by SANZAAR.
You assume the NRL chair does everything on his own........... but he also wasn't going through an open rights tender process on a new broadcast deal with multiple bidders.
Again, you infer that I suggested they need "expensive" media rights consultants, even though neither you or I know the true cost of such a service.
It would appear only one of us is using assumptions to support an existing negative bias towards Rugby Australia.