But I didn't make any mention of GPS Rugby
I was talking more generally about Schools Rugby ( which is not played in State Schools in any organised competition )
And yes , Sunny , I am generally aware of a number of these boys and schools involved etc and I guess my only original point was that some of their peers are already playing School First XV or are getting ready for their First XV season.
You may be right . You may be wrong . But yours, and Chalkie's is a subjective point that is not able to be proven one way or the other. And whether you guys agree with it not , the 25 to 30 kids that have just played or are preparing for their School First XV season this year as a 16 year old , are for now , considered the top of their year group pile.
At a further estimate , I reckon there would probably be about the same number again playing Div 1 Club , two thirds of which , will roll through their school season in AIC or GPS Rugby and where the balance "best in show" are at a non Association school and where Club Rugby is their only platform
So of this remaining third in U16 Div 1 Rugby not at an AIC or GPS School that are at the top end of the talent pool - we may be talking about ten to a dozen boys . Tops.
I acknowledge there may be a late bloomer or two playing at a lower level of competition . Literally .
So I think it is fair to say that , Rugby , with it's financial limitations - and by consequence , meagre resources , must learn and find ways to be efficient in its Talent ID and development pathways .
And it simply isn't efficient to be spending a whole heap of time and energy in running Development Officers in ButtF**K nowhere or in the State Schools in the Rugby League heartlands ( as presently constituted ) or for that matter in mid to late teen "Club" pathways in the City v Country show.
With the financial reality that every layer of Rugby is faced with and their consequent inability to operate and develop true development and meaningful pathway .......they are better off ( from a business case perspective not necessarily an individual and specific Rugby consideration - they are two different things ) letting the Schools do the harvesting an hope the Clubs pick up those who slip through the net and retain them through Colts , Grade and then next level ( whether its NRC or whatever ) next level again ( Super Rugby ) and then next level again ( International ) if they are good enough
And if you lose a smaller percentage of potential prospects who are not in the Combine Harvester that is the Schools System then that is the opportunity cost that in the business case reality has to be foregone .
I understand that this reality may not sit well with you , Chalkie and others that bang the Club Drum - and I don't say that facetiously , but , another reality when Club Advocates go to town , is , more often than not they are applying a logic that worked in their youth but simply doesn't work today.
And here is where a major disconnect lies compared to what the historical reality was up until the mid to late 90's .
Plenty of club advocates want to talk about what's wrong but none of them want to offer any solutions with a large number of stalwarts still magically expecting we're going to rock it out in the Hot Tub Time Machine and bring it back to the way it used to be
That time has been and gone and it isn't going coming back.
I am not anti Club . Far from it . I am anti some of the irascible blowhards that pour scorn on our young blokes and don't use their energies constructively to engage in offering ideas and initiatives within what the constraints are to try and make the game here in Australia stronger