• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

Bledisloe # 3 - Saturday 31st October, ANZ Stadium

sendit

Bob Loudon (25)
well like very roughly 3.3% (population in Aus) x 45 man squad = 1.5

Mate

3.3 is all indigenous

Half it for gender at the very least

Then men between 18-34
Then indigenous that live in a rugby playing state
Then ones who actually play sport

The further you break it down it becomes a smaller and smaller sample size, disproportionately to the rest of society
 

TSR

Andrew Slack (58)
I’m not sure of he correct stats - but surely the figure would hold roughly true as you break it down.

ie if 3.3% of the population is indigenous, surely a similiar percentage of males aged 17 - 34ish are also indigenous. After all there are no women of any age or 45 year old men, indigenous or not, making the Wallabies.
 

Up the Guts

Steve Williams (59)
Stuff the stats, AFL and League have real cultural connections to Indigenous communities which is why they have so many more Indigenous players. There are plenty of super talented Indigenous athletes from the northern rivers but they live and breathe NRL. Indigenous kids growing up in NT and WA all play AFL.

If we want more Indigenous athletes in the game then we need to work out how we can capture the talent from AFL and League. I wouldn’t want to be put in charge of that task though, bloody hard to change 100+ years of community involvement in a single sport.
 

KOB1987

John Eales (66)
Swings and roundabouts. Of the 933 Wallabies 14 of them have been of indigenous descent. That’s about 120 years of data. That means that statistically for every 67 players, one will be indigenous. Although Kurtley would struggle to make the Wallabies this year, he would probably still make a squad of 67 if he was still here. There were two main periods of overrepresentation in those figures - the period encompassing the Ella’s and Lloyd Walker, and we are very recently out of the other, the period encompassing Beale, the Fainga'a twins, and Hodgson.

Anyways, we’d all love it if there were more. And this is the Bled 3 thread anyway!
 

TSR

Andrew Slack (58)
I do think the lack of indigenous athletes in rugby is a sad reflection - not necessarily on the intent of anyone - but on the lack of strategy. However I have seen first hand that there have been significant efforts made to improve that. Not all of the efforts, IMO, have been perfectly executed, but I do think there has been a very clear intent and some of the people involved are very passionate from what I’ve seen. Hopefully the current problems don’t set the efforts back too far. It would be great to see indigenous participation grow across the board (along with participation generally).

Edit: sorry, of track from the thread.
 

ACT Crusader

Jim Lenehan (48)
I do think the lack of indigenous athletes in rugby is a sad reflection - not necessarily on the intent of anyone - but on the lack of strategy. However I have seen first hand that there have been significant efforts made to improve that. Not all of the efforts, IMO, have been perfectly executed, but I do think there has been a very clear intent and some of the people involved are very passionate from what I’ve seen. Hopefully the current problems don’t set the efforts back too far. It would be great to see indigenous participation grow across the board (along with participation generally).

Edit: sorry, of track from the thread.

I’d be interested in what people are noticing at club level with participation. Don’t spend too much time these days around the club scene in Melbourne, but back in the day there was the odd indigenous player at Moorabbin or Box Hill but pretty rare in 1st grade.

I don’t think rugby can compete with league or AFL when it comes to grassroots participation and the way current and former indigenous players are used to promote the their games. Rugby might be better served in being involved with other sports to grow participation in sports more generally. And use current Wallabies players to promote the game (and themselves) that way.

Positive exposure is still a major hurdle for OZ rugby.
 

ACT Crusader

Jim Lenehan (48)
I’m not sure of he correct stats - but surely the figure would hold roughly true as you break it down.

ie if 3.3% of the population is indigenous, surely a similiar percentage of males aged 17 - 34ish are also indigenous. After all there are no women of any age or 45 year old men, indigenous or not, making the Wallabies.

If you’re interested, a breakdown of last census data that shows indigenous population by age and sex compared to non-indigenous is at

https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/australias-welfare/profile-of-indigenous-australians
 
  • Like
Reactions: TSR

Derpus

Nathan Sharpe (72)
Stuff the stats, AFL and League have real cultural connections to Indigenous communities which is why they have so many more Indigenous players. There are plenty of super talented Indigenous athletes from the northern rivers but they live and breathe NRL. Indigenous kids growing up in NT and WA all play AFL.

If we want more Indigenous athletes in the game then we need to work out how we can capture the talent from AFL and League. I wouldn’t want to be put in charge of that task though, bloody hard to change 100+ years of community involvement in a single sport.

Any move would have to be a very well calculated slow burn. Getting the game onto 9 would be a decent start.

Wonder what Fox's sign up rate is among the indigenous population. Not high I imagine.
 

wamberal

Phil Kearns (64)
My feelings about the issue of indigenous representation are conditioned by my lived experiences, I suppose that is the same for all of us. I grew up in an Australia which was still part of the British Empire, we were taught virtually nothing at school about our indigenous population and their history. The only indigenous people that I was aware of growing up were either boxers or rugby league players.

In my twenties I shared a flat with Mick Bryant, a schoolteacher of indigenous descent, who played first grade with Manly Warringah Seagulls. I met a few of his mates too, of course, one of them went on to become very influential in indigenous affairs and politics. I learnt a lot about the similarities between us, but also the differences. My respect for indigenous culture rose the more I learnt.

The question of apartheid in sport was to the fore around then, and rugby was, of course, a prime focus. What sort of image did we have amongst our indigenous population because of that? And there must have been discrimination in our sport here, there was discrimination just about everywhere you looked back then.

I worked with a Queenslander who played one Test, and represented the state a number of times, overlapping a bit with Lloyd McDermott. He told me that McDermott's indigenous heritage was not recognised, and if it had been, in my friend's opinion he would never have been selected for the state team in the first place.

When the Ellas burst onto the scene it was like glorious rain falling after a long drought. The doors were open. But, not all that surprisingly, not too many indigenous kids came running into our game. Partly because of our historical indifference or active discrimination, partly because league and AFL are games that are obviously more appealing and less "technical" to play at junior levels, partly because there are more opportunities, partly because there is more money on offer.

We in Australia have very little, virtually nothing, to celebrate as a code in terms of our indigenous base. I would like to see us making some sacrifices as a code to "close the gap". Now is probably not the right time, given the circumstances, but we should lay out a proper plan.

I would prefer to see our national team running out in a plain golden jersey embossed with a sprig of wattle, green shorts and with a black armband. Sponsors should be invited to make a donation to a fighting fund.
 

fatprop

George Gregan (70)
Staff member
That isn't the course of least disruption by any means.

Rennie won't be debuting a 20 year old at 10 in the must-win Bledisloe decider.

The All Blacks would be licking their lips at that 10-12 defensive channel.

Did you see how many tackles O'Conner missed on Sunday? His defense is bad enough at 10.

Simone is a big physical man and an excellent defender. Lolesio is 5 years younger than Simone, 15 kgs lighter and the All Blacks would surely target him at 10 and rattle him early on.

I'm not sure starting young Lolesio and having to shift one of your key leaders in O'Conner to 12 would be wise at all.

Rennie will surely choose the course of least disruption, O'Conner 10, Simone 12, Petaia 13.

Simone doesn't play like a "big physical man" he is a ball player
 

fatprop

George Gregan (70)
Staff member
He is solid defensively though

I just listened to the rugby ruckus podcast, Mr Tirinui highlighted that most of the defensive errors were about structure and trust in the units next to you and knowing what they will do

I standby my point that for the moment we need more cohesion so pick players as units wherever possible - Petaia and Koro are the only 2 special backs we have, the rest ........... are no better than their replacements
 

Up the Guts

Steve Williams (59)
I just listened to the rugby ruckus podcast, Mr Tirinui highlighted that most of the defensive errors were about structure and trust in the units next to you and knowing what they will do

I standby my point that for the moment we need more cohesion so pick players as units wherever possible - Petaia and Koro are the only 2 special backs we have, the rest ..... are no better than their replacements
What was Morgs assessment of the entire game? Wallabies errors cost them or NZ just too good?
 

Derpus

Nathan Sharpe (72)
I just listened to the rugby ruckus podcast, Mr Tirinui highlighted that most of the defensive errors were about structure and trust in the units next to you and knowing what they will do

I standby my point that for the moment we need more cohesion so pick players as units wherever possible - Petaia and Koro are the only 2 special backs we have, the rest ..... are no better than their replacements

So White-Lolesio-Simone-Petaia it is.
 

Joe Blow

John Hipwell (52)
So White-Lolesio-Simone-Petaia it is.
More likely that JOC (James O'Connor) will start at 10 if fit and Lolesio will come it at some point in the second stanza. Simone is a good choice being a specialist 12 and a decent sized lad.
 

ACT Crusader

Jim Lenehan (48)
I just listened to the rugby ruckus podcast, Mr Tirinui highlighted that most of the defensive errors were about structure and trust in the units next to you and knowing what they will do

I standby my point that for the moment we need more cohesion so pick players as units wherever possible - Petaia and Koro are the only 2 special backs we have, the rest ..... are no better than their replacements

The lack of combinations was noticeable for the ABs defence as well. Goodhue and Clarke defending down the left side were a little exposed at times and not because they aren’t good tacklers or robust in defence, but because they don’t have experience together to know reactions, patterns etc.
 
Top