The chinks in Chek are starting to show, there is no hiding place once a national HC gets to around 8-10 Tests of tenure.
snip
....etc
Lots of good points here. A few responses:
- Team changes: I'm not sure Chieka was being completely reckless here. We didn't win (much like every Wallaby team since 1986, and everyone since 1994), so in that way it didn't work, but whilst the final result wasn't close, the margin for error was not great - a handful of better decisions/outcomes and the result is very different. I certainly don't think Chieka can be compared with Deans yet - 'experiments' in previous weeks did lead to some success already. It may be that there are benefits to playing the extended squad over the last few weeks that are only obvious at training, and hopefully soon at the RWC.
- Squandered enthusiasm: some great wins, one loss. Fair minded supporters will still be enthusiastic.
- Were all of Chieka's changes a bad idea? Were they all of the problem? Many pundits were supportive of Phipps and Foley being dropped or benched. Speight for Mitchell wasn't hugely controversial. Palu and Skelton were widely criticised changes (but were replaced by the starters from the previous week before the 7 minutes that ended our chances). Would a similar result (highly possible), with the exact same team as the previous week, have been more damaging. I'd say yes, in all ways.
- Cheika coaching the Tahs and the Wallabies: I would agree that it was not ideal for either party. Is it hubris or confidence, or maybe someone who couldn't resist coaching the Wallabies but didn't want to simply abandon the Tahs? At that late stage, I think the Tahs would certainly have been worse off.
- comprehensive Wallaby coaching team: this is an ongoing organisational issue with Australian rugby. I don't think it is particular to Chieka. AFAIK, he did approach Michael Foley to be forwards coach, but it didn't come to fruition. I too would like to see top coaches recruited aggressively, but that would take time, and likely money the ARU doesn't have. The same issues would apply to the whole Australian rugby coaching system. This all must change, and if no improvements are forthcoming in a year then Chieka will end up being as culpable as the other significant parties. At this stage, maybe he is having to make the best of the system and situation.
- at least we aren't the Springboks