It really is terrible luck. My brother randomly ruptured his Achilles' and I asked a specialist I work for whether it was inevitable and he said it was roughly random.Geez if nathan Harris didn't have bad luck you would think he got no luck at all!! He will never want to be named to start a test again you would think.
OK, so inn relation to our near future No 12 prospects, I can only say, "there are none so blind as those who will not see". And I include Cheika/Larkham in that category.
The more I think about it, the more I'm struggling to work out how we're going to win tomorrow night. We don't have many glaring areas of weakness, but neither can I point to any where we have it over the AB's. When I look at the two squads I can't see many ways that we're going to attack them and at the same time inhibit their strengths. Maybe at the breakdown and maybe in the midfield, but even then it's not with a great deal of confidence. On the other hand, the AB's have attacking threats all over the park and we'll have our hands full containing them. We'll have to play out of our skins and they will have to be off their game a bit (rather like Sydney last year).
We certainly can't win by playing safe rugby as was suggested on the front page, by taking our points and waiting for the penalties to come.
The notable Australian wins in the Supe this year were all from a combination of smashing them up front and highly attacking backline play. That actually yielded some big scores.
The worse team must take risks or it will lose. The only advantage of losing safely is that it doesn't give the Internet as many arrows to fire after the game.
For example, if we get a pen kick from in front at 0-0 we should take the line out or the scrum. Get in their faces. If we fail to score then we weren't good enough. Our pigs also need to run into contact like those Lions okes did this year - into it and through it, before they're set. We know Cheika likes those kinds of tight forward running lines. That means Genia has to be lightning off the base. If we voluntarily slow our own ball down we're going to get hammered.
If we win it'll be in the forwards, because our backs are hopelessly outclassed. And we can win in the forwards. But our backs have to finish half opportunities.
This is like the 1980s, which I remember.
I'm not sure that's right in Folau's case. He's an attacking weapon when he defends at fullback. He actively prevents teams playing their optimal kicking game. To play him in the defensive line would be to shoot ourselves in the foot. The question is only where he's most effective when we have the ball. Wherever that is, we should play him there. He has more penetration than the rest of the team combined, which has less penetration than my granddad in a convent, and he's dead.
Kurtley Beale is the biggest loss to the Wallabies this year. I would suggest that had he been fit we most likely would have won the series against the Poms and I would feel much better if he was on the bench tomorrow.
Cheika will bring him straight back into the squad as soon as he is remotely close to fit. Hopefully Hodge gets some time at 12 during the RC as he is logically the next cab off the rank.
We certainly can't win by playing safe rugby as was suggested on the front page, by taking our points and waiting for the penalties to come.
...If we win it'll be in the forwards, ....
I agree with that and I never thought I'd say that about KB (Kurtley Beale). He really did rise to the occasion last year and we're missing his running threat off Foley's shoulder this season.
Mate to think that the ARU has the capacity to organise local espionage is laughably disconnected from reality.
Kiwis probably found a Nokia 6110 behind the couch and reacted like the chimps in 2001: A Space Odyssey.
Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk
Very depressing. Fantastic physicality and wonderful skills.