I agree that 5 years is a bit out there. I was contending the inference that he was signed as captain for 5 years. That was the silly bit.Very few if any of the criticisms of the contract are about the value placed on Hooper. Though that is the one element the defenders try to limit the debate to. It is simply the five year duration that most, perhaps all, are critical of.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk