ACT Crusader
Jim Lenehan (48)
The politics forum unfortunately descended into endless cycles of the same arguments. Think Quade or Kurtley threads and substitute for Abbott, Gillard and Rudd.....
Fortunately or unfortunately sport, politics and culture are inextricably and inevitably bound. As far as possible sport should assist building an inclusive and tolerant society.
I think rugby supporters should vocally reject the racial vilification of Adam Goodes. We should support positive cultural expressions of our pride in our country's Indigenous heritage like performing an Aboriginal war dance before test matches.
Read this article, it really is an eye opener.
http://theconversation.com/we-all-know-and-admire-the-haka-so-why-not-one-of-our-own-45432
Fortunately or unfortunately sport, politics and culture are inextricably and inevitably bound. As far as possible sport should assist building an inclusive and tolerant society.
I think rugby supporters should vocally reject the racial vilification of Adam Goodes. We should support positive cultural expressions of our pride in our country's Indigenous heritage like performing an Aboriginal war dance before test matches.
Read this article, it really is an eye opener.
http://theconversation.com/we-all-know-and-admire-the-haka-so-why-not-one-of-our-own-45432
Although we've only had 2 Tests in the TWC it's still useful to run a stats comparison between Pocock and Hooper.
-snip-
Pocock has shown the better tackling game with more tackles and zero tackles missed. Hooper made a couple of 'dominant' tackles
-snip-
Both players have had the same number of ruck involvements.
Pocock has slightly earlier arrival and more impact.
Hooper has been strong in supporting the Wallaby ball carriers.
Pocock has been strong in putting pressure on the opposition ball.
Pocock has had a Turn Over Won rate of 1 TOW per 3 Defensive Rucks.
Hooper has had a TOW rate of 1 TOW per 6 Defensive Rucks.
Due to his extra involvement in Defensive Rucks, Pocock (1.4) gets penalised at 2 x Hooper's (0.7) penalty rate.
Hopper has scored a Try and 1 Try Assist.
Remember, the Wallabies were up against very different opposition.
-snip-
New Zealand team looking far from impregnable so far. Time to impregnate them. Wallabies!
On tonightWhat's going on with the SANZAR appeal?
What's going on with the SANZAR appeal?
I have been suggesting there should be an acknowledgment and celebration of Australia's Indigenous history and culture before next weeks match (the topic of this thread). How is this not discussing Bledisloe 1?And now it's time to get back to rugby!
If that happened on the field, it would leave John Hopoate for dust.I think there will be tussle if a Wallaby tried to impregnate Read, or indeed any AB. The game will be exciting enough without any of those sort of shenanigans.
New Zealand is also a pluralist society yet they are able to acknowledge and celebrate the survival and strength of their indigenous people. Why can't Australia do the same, symbolic gestures like this are an important part of the reconciliation process. Think about South Africa's anthem and flag and new Zealand's haka - what does Australiara have?If we're going to have a uniquely Australian cultural statement, it should be something other than a localized copy of New Zealand's cultural statement. Australia is a pluralist society. It consists of more than indigenous people. Represent us all, including the indigenous people.
Sorry. Bledisloe eh? New Zealand team looking far from impregnable so far. Time to impregnate them. Wallabies!
Think about South Africa's anthem and flag and new Zealand's haka - what does Australiara have?
New Zealand is also a pluralist society yet they are able to acknowledge and celebrate the survival and strength of their indigenous people. Why can't Australia do the same, symbolic gestures like this are an important part of the reconciliation process. Think about South Africa's anthem and flag and new Zealand's haka - what does Australiara have?
[quote="drop kick, post: 770715, member: 320]Think about South Africa's anthem and flag and new Zealand's haka - what does Australiara have?
Literally, a continent's worth of diverse peoples, cultures and languages, with 40,000 years worth of different histories that can't be reduced to a unified symbolic gesture?
Yes it's too hard isn't it? Let's forget about it for another 200 years.[quote="drop kick, post: 770715, member: 320]Thttp://theconversation.com/we-all-know-and-admire-the-haka-so-why-not-one-of-our-own-http://theconversation.com/we-all-know-and-admire-the-haka-so-why-not-one-of-our-own-4543245432hink about South Africa's anthem and flag and new Zealand's haka - what does Australiara have?
Literally, a continent's worth of diverse peoples, cultures and languages, with 40,000 years worth of different histories that can't be reduced to a unified symbolic gesture?