jollyswagman
Ron Walden (29)
And the definition of madness is..
.......not including George Smith in the RWC squad.
And the definition of madness is..
Horwill yes, but when was the last time Mumm packed at lock against an international level scrum? We have no real idea how he'd goBUT if we start Horwill or Mumm at lock surely it will not affect the set-piece allowing us to start Hooper and Pocock.
.
I prefer to boil it up
Horwill yes, but when was the last time Mumm packed at lock against an international level scrum? We have no real idea how he'd go
edit - looked it up, 5 years ago. He started at lock for most of the 2010 domestic season, before losing his spot to Chisolm and that was partnering Nathan Sharpe. So there's quite a good chance our scrum wasn't that great, but it may not have been his fault.
. I prefer to internalise my pain and explode at a random point down the track.
I'm not sure Mumm is being looked at as a serious lock option. Maybe against the minows, but suspect he's in the same boat as Fardy (probably his understudy). I strongly expect that Douglas and Carter will fight it out for the 4th lock spot in the squad. Douglas appears to be Cheika's preference.
Personally I wouldn't go with Pooper. I actually think impact of bringing a second 7 into the game at around the 50 minute mark seems to be having a positive influence on our second half performance, an area where we have traditionally failed against the kiwis. I like the idea that the workrate of our pack actually increases as the game rolls on.
I for one am totally mystified as to how a simple incident that lasts mere seconds and for which there is extensive video to examine over and over again in slo-mo and with magnifiers can possibly lead to a hearing that lasts so long or is so complex that it requires - incredulously - an adjournment for even more time to think and consider.
The only possible positive could be like a recent, similar hearing where the adjudicating powers needed formal confirmation that Hooper would realistically be considered for play this Saturday and so in that event such would count as one week of some final suspension penalty.
Thoughts on the selections for the two Bleds:
The performances of Higginbotham, Leali'ifano and Speight against the ABs should clear up their selections, or not, in the RWC squad.
- Smith and Faulkner have been selected for the RWC squad, it's time to see how good they are as they'll both be required in England some time later this year. One gets a run from the bench the first week, the other the following week
- Slipper desperately needs some time in rehab. I'd risk giving him three weeks off to attend to his niggles.
- The backup second-rower spot needs to be sorted out. I'd have Horwill for one match and Mumm or Arnold the other.
- Higgers gets a final chance to see if he's up to test rugby. These two matches are a golden opportunity to tie down his spot in the RWC squad as the backup 6; I'd start him for one of the tests as BSF.
- DO NOT START HOOPER AND POCOCK TOGETHER FOR EITHER MATCH! We'll get murdered at the set piece.
- Palu should get a start at 8 for the second game to see if he's regained fitness.
- Leali'ifano's Super form this year warrants a start at 12, I'd have him there for both matches.
- Foley starts one match, Cooper the other.
- Is Genia up to a bench spot for either test?
- Speight's Super form warrants a start in at least one match.
I'm not saying that I would pick them today but 3 years ago, are you saying you would have taken Speight over Ioane.
My point is simply that Speight has, to date, proven nothing at Test level.
And the definition of madness is..