RedsHappy
Tony Shaw (54)
Some of us were intrigued to read just this week that the ARU has decided - on economic viability grounds - to prune the number of contracted Wallabies back to 32 only. Then Nuci and RD will decide the $ size of each player's contract within that quota. None of this seemed to attract too much commentary.
I think it's worth a bit of GAGR review of this matter. Why?
IMO, the once-every-12-years BIL tour in 2013 is arguably more important in total for the promotion and viability of Australian rugby than any offshore RWC.
First, the considerable $ income, or income potential, of the extensive Aus-wide tour is preserved locally at both State RU and ARU levels. Packed stadia should be expected.
Second, the many games involved will include both a number of State franchises and the Wallabies. And this feeds down to local code enthusiasm and promotion at Australian Grade, Club and school levels, etc.
Third, it's my hypothesis that everyday Aussie winter sports fans will be more attracted to the us v Pommies (a la Ashes) theme in all this than some far away us v Canada and multiple other teams in a comp that takes 7 weeks to complete and is not in the same TZ. Plus, no other football code delivers (inside Australia) anything like this internationally based, gladiatorial spectacle of old world v new world rivalry.
Four, as above the games are in Aus TZs, and the same one for the whole East Coast market.
Summarily, if the BIL tour is promoted well by all the RUs, and especially the ARU, this tour should be an exciting, continuous, and economically lucrative showcase for the very best of Australian rugby, and for the quality of the code itself. It should draw consistently good crowds and viewerships. It should attract great publicity. A tour win by the Wallabies and by one or two franchises could be precisely the boost the game badly needs here. Inversely, a series of weak performances and a Tour loss would 'not be at all desirable' for the code's best course forward in Aus.
When the ARU Board decided that it was optimal that JO'N and RD simultaneously stayed in place through 2013, the BIL tour was mentioned by JO'N as a key factor in that thinking.
Let's juxtapose the above - and some may disagree with my assessment - with the decision to head into this fantastic rugby sweet-store with a contracted Wallaby squad of 32 players only, essentially a buffer of 10 over a match day 22. The BIL tour - 9 matches all up - will somehow sit in the middle of the 2013 S15, and the injury position from the pre-tour S15 will carry into the tour and back into the late stage S15. And let's remember the RWC 2011 injury situation, as it unfolded.
Our S15 teams today are struggling to make good performances within the 30 player constraint rule. Any 'non 32' potential Wallabies this year and next will not have the benefit of training and technical support within the Wallaby system for the crucial BIL tour. What will happen to the, say, 10-15 players just outside that tight 32. Will they stay motivated?
Seems an important topic, if you agree with me the re the BIL upcoming. 32 squad members seems way low to me. What are your thoughts rugby comrades, both re squad sizing, but equally squad and national planning generally for this fantastic opportunity in code promotion?
I think it's worth a bit of GAGR review of this matter. Why?
IMO, the once-every-12-years BIL tour in 2013 is arguably more important in total for the promotion and viability of Australian rugby than any offshore RWC.
First, the considerable $ income, or income potential, of the extensive Aus-wide tour is preserved locally at both State RU and ARU levels. Packed stadia should be expected.
Second, the many games involved will include both a number of State franchises and the Wallabies. And this feeds down to local code enthusiasm and promotion at Australian Grade, Club and school levels, etc.
Third, it's my hypothesis that everyday Aussie winter sports fans will be more attracted to the us v Pommies (a la Ashes) theme in all this than some far away us v Canada and multiple other teams in a comp that takes 7 weeks to complete and is not in the same TZ. Plus, no other football code delivers (inside Australia) anything like this internationally based, gladiatorial spectacle of old world v new world rivalry.
Four, as above the games are in Aus TZs, and the same one for the whole East Coast market.
Summarily, if the BIL tour is promoted well by all the RUs, and especially the ARU, this tour should be an exciting, continuous, and economically lucrative showcase for the very best of Australian rugby, and for the quality of the code itself. It should draw consistently good crowds and viewerships. It should attract great publicity. A tour win by the Wallabies and by one or two franchises could be precisely the boost the game badly needs here. Inversely, a series of weak performances and a Tour loss would 'not be at all desirable' for the code's best course forward in Aus.
When the ARU Board decided that it was optimal that JO'N and RD simultaneously stayed in place through 2013, the BIL tour was mentioned by JO'N as a key factor in that thinking.
Let's juxtapose the above - and some may disagree with my assessment - with the decision to head into this fantastic rugby sweet-store with a contracted Wallaby squad of 32 players only, essentially a buffer of 10 over a match day 22. The BIL tour - 9 matches all up - will somehow sit in the middle of the 2013 S15, and the injury position from the pre-tour S15 will carry into the tour and back into the late stage S15. And let's remember the RWC 2011 injury situation, as it unfolded.
Our S15 teams today are struggling to make good performances within the 30 player constraint rule. Any 'non 32' potential Wallabies this year and next will not have the benefit of training and technical support within the Wallaby system for the crucial BIL tour. What will happen to the, say, 10-15 players just outside that tight 32. Will they stay motivated?
Seems an important topic, if you agree with me the re the BIL upcoming. 32 squad members seems way low to me. What are your thoughts rugby comrades, both re squad sizing, but equally squad and national planning generally for this fantastic opportunity in code promotion?