waratahjesus said:
i think we are still short of outside centres.
we needed a genuine fullback option so AAC (Adam Ashley-Cooper) could stay at 13 plus with mortlock still out, who is stepping into 13 if we need another?
Exactly right. I have to eat some humble pie here because it was only 18 months ago, or so, that I was whingeing about why AAC (Adam Ashley-Cooper) was playing fullback for Oz. Anybody could see that 13 was his natural position though he wasn't a bad winger - but he wasn't even a good fullback when he played there for the Brumbies.
Maybe my original opinion was bunk or maybe we should all realise that we shouldn't get locked into a fixed position about players.
"Digby Ioane is a limited player because he can't act as a de facto fullback when the 15 chases his own kick upfield" is another of my gems, as were sarcastic remarks about Chisholm before the 2008 EOYT.
But I digress. It's unfortunate in a way that AAC (Adam Ashley-Cooper) is the best fullback that we have because it emphasises the lack of depth we have at 13. Horne and Mortlock crocked (and Horne not match fit or experienced enough anyway), and Ioane parked on the wing until he gets his legs back, means that Cross is the only choice to play outside centre.
Tyrone Smith played 13 for Manly this year so that Sefania could play at 12, and whilst he was OK in the slower paced game of the Shute Shield, you'd never want to see him play there in a test match. If Cross got crocked I'd rather see Mitchell go to fullback and AAC (Adam Ashley-Cooper) to 13.
Talk about T. Smith and Tom Carter makes me go back to not locking into an opinion of players. It has been my experience over watching more decades of rugby than I want to remind myself of, that players are neither as good as we insist they are, nor as bad.
Carter's good play for Sydney Uni at the Shute Shield level is undeniable as is that of his team mate Daniel Halangahu, but one cannot deny either that he hasn't seized his chances to help the players outside him even taking into account any forensic mitigation that could be argued. This is not a scientific statistical criticism of Carter: it is a "if it walks like a duck and quacks, it is a duck" analysis.
Next year I hope to be able to admit that Carter is another player I have been wrong about, but until then, he is a duck.