fatprop said:I don't understand why Deans persists with MMM at lock when Mumm is at 6.
Mumm is a better scrummager plays tighter and harder, if both are played stick Mumm at lock :angryfire:
Scarfman said:Hugh McMeniman
B: 01/11/83
H: 200cm
W: 114kg
P: Lock/Flanker
Dean Mumm
B: 05/03/1984
H: 196cm
W: 109kg
P: Lock/Flanker
Who wouldn't pick McM at lock and Mumm at 6? Everyone was bawling that Al Kannar (196cms) was too short for lock and now they want Mumm there.
It's just that McM still sucks at locking. Which is why he has fallen a bit in my regard. I would pick Mumm above him in both positions.
rugbywhisperer said:For those of you not old enough, two of the best ever games of Rugby, NZ v the Baa Baa's 1971 and Aust vs Baa Baas when Andrew Slacks team took the Grand slam and the Baa Baa's - great month that.
Ash said:Blue; you think that Smit's future is at tight head? Are there plans for him to stay there after the EOYT?
If Smit gets a mortgage on your 3 jersey, I'm sure you Saffas could let us borrow a few tight heads for 10 or 20 years...
brokendown gunfighter said:the NZ v Baa Baas match was actually in early 1973rugbywhisperer said:For those of you not old enough, two of the best ever games of Rugby, NZ v the Baa Baa's 1971 and Aust vs Baa Baas when Andrew Slacks team took the Grand slam and the Baa Baa's - great month that.
I happened to be over there at the time,but for various reasons couldnt make it to the match
sorry for being pedantic
Agree with you and the same go with Pienaar & Steyn in 10 for the Guppies. I read somewhere Plumtree want to rotate them in the position. Its important they do this and this will help them a lot with the burn out issue also.Blue said:Ash said:Blue; you think that Smit's future is at tight head? Are there plans for him to stay there after the EOYT?
If Smit gets a mortgage on your 3 jersey, I'm sure you Saffas could let us borrow a few tight heads for 10 or 20 years...
Do I think it's right? No. But Puppet has shown his hand and it looks likely that Smit will feature a lot at 3 in future. it is very much a move to prolong his career because you can't leave Bismarck on the bench. The best thing that could happen is for Smit to play regularly at 3 for the Sharks next year and hopefully the lines of communication from the Boks to the Sharks is in place (which I guess they should be with Muir in the Bok setup). That means we could see Smit rotating in and out of 3 and 2 with the two du Plessis brothers. It could be a very good thing that we have four Sharks (Beast, Bismarck, Smit and Jannie) playing fifteen (yes not 13 Super 14 games together next year and the whole lot move into green from there with Mujati added to the bench.
So yeah I think the plan is there to keep him there until we see otherwise (it's SA so who the fark knows). I think it could work out ok and don't think he will ever really dominate anybody but he will more than hold his own. The unit of the Fishie 4 is they key here and that could work out well for the next RWC.
rugbywhisperer said:Can us Queensland residents count on some of you guys to post scores every now and then tomorrow morning.
Appreciated if you can.
Lindommer said:Impossible. The only one approaching LG's age is Biffo.