I think that over the last few years some of the less talented states "traditionally" are getting better development pathways and coaches. Its only natural that you will start to see a lot more WA, VIC & ACT sides getting players into the OZ schools sides. All the boys I am aware of that have made higher honours over the last 4 years from ACT, are either playing first grade rugby either JID or SS, U20's OZ, OZ 7's & Super 15 etc. So anyone who thinks some of the boys from these other states are somehow less deserving in some way, or that they don't stay in the game are wrong. Just because certain teams didn't perform as good as others, selectors always look at individual performances (on & off the ball). Work rate etc.
I made no criticism of him at all.How long have you been reading his mind? You should put your hand up to coach . Are the ARU getting it wrong by re appointing him? Seems everyone is wrong but you .
McGregor had a bruised hip suffered early into Mondays game when he came off. He didn't play again until Thursday v qld 1. That same injury obviously caused him some real pain in Saturdays game, but especially given that I still thought he played very well. Biggest problem for nsw2 on Saturday was losing Kennewell with a head knock early in the game. NSW 1 put at least 3 tries on in the first half through that right side defense when he was no longer on the field. When you look at the back 3 for nsw1, they were always going to cause some trouble out there particularly without Kennewell.Reminds me of the final in the Under 16's in 2012 where NSW gave QLD a 30 point head start, and then they decided to play in the second half. Unfortunately the good guys left their run too late in 2012, and the same today with NSW II. Brad Gill was head coach then. Perhaps his specialty is half time talks.
NSW II looked shell shocked in the first half with the backs letting their opponents simply run around and through them as the ball was spun wide and fast. McGregor seemed to be carrying an injury from Thursday which wouldn't have helped the NSW II backline. O'Shea directed traffic well for the I's.
Sambo and Helmets boy's ?Hi Brian
1&2. I'm pushed really hard to think of an occasion in the last 25 years where this hasn't happened. If I was coach and had a kid who'd been there, done that I'd be inclined towards him. Yes there was an element of the facetious here but I felt the comment was timely given there will be a frenzy about selections in the next 24 hours - I'm merely reminding people previous selections will be getting the call again and to scheme/tip the remaining positions with this in mind.
3. The Wallaby connection comment stands - watch it tomorrow these two will make the teams. I'm sure the kids can play - my question is - would they be looked at as much if their surname was different? Facetious - maybe but I understood this to be a forum where opinions could be expressed even if they challenge sacred cows.
4 &5. hey Brian - you go back through the teams, pal, - all the way back. You'll see the rough figures add up to 2 x as many boys from NSW/ACT as from Qld. Maybe go back to the 1969 tour to RSA where I think Qld got two boys in the whole party. Go back to when Q2 won for the first time in '06 - beating NSW1 and NSW2 and still got trumped at the selection table. Add those numbers up and see whose argument is "sadly lacking". I'm not saying this just to be smart - there are facts behind things I say and it irritates me to think my opinions could just be emotively dismissed by one who has not checked things like I have.
6. Wow - struck a nerve there! He doth protest too much. Look at the fact I raised and either refute it with your own facts or let it sit and put your bro-mance to one side. Cronan has NOT coached a schools 1st XV and has NOT coached at state level and yet is afforded a role as an ARFSU selector. I did not question his service to Australian schools rugby. Sorry that it spoils the framing of your response to this comment but my sons are interested in different sports, they have not missed a rugby selection so I have no personal axe to grind with the guy. I would rather see players take advice from an experienced coach.
7. So finally we are agreed and, yes, I am moving on.
Damn... Did I miss something?there were more than 2 involved - unless this is an obscure mexican dialect.
Besides which Monday's Expert had some good points (I know nothing of the bloke he had a swing at) which I felt deserved investigation to see what hard figures said about a potential bias to NSW in selections over 40+ years.
You're not a mod. If you think its off topic report it.
Damn. Did I miss something?
Not really.Looking at the numbers, with only one full back nominated, I think he is one of those three that they are waiting on for confirmation.
James Kane (Kings) used to be a useful #15 but is injured IIRC. Perhaps they want to see if Kane gets fit again, and if so, how he goes in comparison to Porter. If Kane rises to the occasion, then perhaps he may be the second #15, and if he doesn't then Porter gets the nod.
Are there any other quality #15's around in QLD or NSW Schools rugby injured ATM?
A sense of entitlement maybe?I agree a number of kids are left asking themselves where they went wrong... good luck to the parents in explaining how life's not fair
If you think that the tears will still be scalding over non-selection in a year then i suggest you will have wasted that year.will anyone really care in a year?
I do feel for them but what puts it into perspective for me is that through the whole process there are boys who "should have made it" but didn't at every stage. Therefore there are boys out their who trialled for CHS(as an example) at the regionals and missed out and all the good judges say they were hard done by. So these boys who missed out last weekend are in the same boat as many many others, they just have to deal with it a few week later. The disappointing thing for me is those boys who missed out further back maybe lost to rugby.I have been going to this event for many years, and there is always conjecture over selections. The simple fact is, that in some cases, the players are pre-selected, and the tournament is about filling holes. It will not change. I agree the nsw 15 was outstanding, my player of the finals anyway. The players selected should be congratulated, but you must feel for some who played out of their skins, with little reward.
I do feel for them but what puts it into perspective for me is that through the whole process there are boys who "should have made it" but didn't at every stage. Therefore there are boys out their who trialled for CHS(as an example) at the regionals and missed out and all the good judges say they were hard done by. So these boys who missed out last weekend are in the same boat as many many others, they just have to deal with it a few week later. The disappointing thing for me is those boys who missed out further back maybe lost to rugby.
There is only room for twelve eggs in a standard carton, once full if you like a new one better you have to remove one already in its place. you should always check before you pay for the carton as you might need to replace a broken eggBut you can't do anything about that.
Its a human process in every facet.
There is only room for twelve eggs in a standard carton, once full if you like a new one better you have to remove one already in its place. you should always check before you pay for the carton as you might need to replace a broken egg
A sense of entitlement maybe?
I am sorry, but this statement leaves me wondering