Been mulling over all of this garbage ALOT over the past few days. Gone through the whole gamut of emotions: shock and anger, but now mainly just fear for the game I love. Some thoughts:
<clip>
Nice to see some clear thinking.
Look, I don't agree on the ANZAC linkage, nor do I agree on Super being the correct product. But we have apparently locked in a 10 year rugby sentence with Super. The proposal continues the top-down approach that has gotten us in this mess. I would actually prefer handing the keys to RA HQ to the SRU and say "go for it".
Better would be a National Comp with a local champion (a la Covid domestic series) would be far superior, followed by a shorter cross Tasman where the Aus teams go through a selection for say two teams (not unlike SOO). Have the Wallaby coaching team split and augmented with the National coaches for those rep teams. I guess that would be an Aus-centric pathway as who knows what impact in NZ.
If we are to follow more-or-less the current Super format, we are in trouble. It hasnt proven enough for funding 5 teams to success and shrinkage exacerbates the issue for the short term gain in quality and a dubious gain to the Wallabies. It is however fundamental that an on-going Super comp actively interupts the status quo to ensure a much less lop-sided comp. Talent availability and encouragement to move talent is key. Key to the comp. Perhaps not key to overall quality and the All Blacks. So good luck with imagining greatly improved behaviour from NZRU. But it is what we have.
It will shackle any domestic comp - even starting with the term "third tier" is a killer. Do they call the NRL "third tier"? It sits behind SOO and international afterall. Whether that comp is NRC-esq, or gives the SRU what they want with hangers-on, it really isnt logical to think it will truly flourish behind the "professional game" (Super) which likely wont be flourishing in Australia either.
Still, we appear locked -n and if no-one has the balls to put some TNT under Super, and a dose of
salts reality through the Kiwis in terms of what we are willing to accommodate, then as a last man standing option - your plan for Super is close to optimum.
I would determinedly avoid any decisions that preclude or increase the difficulty of parting ways in the future or radically changing things in the future. SO I am not a supporter of independence of the comp. Additionally independence of the comp runs against centralisation within Australia.
FWIW From my POV any form of Super as the driving force to Australian rugby is another train hitting the previous train-wreck in slo mo. We have hit an inflection point, more of the same that got us here is, well insert your own adjective.
On a personal level, I really don't know where I now head with my rugby support. I am struggling to escape genuine indifference to the Wallabies and I'm highly unlikely to have a different view to any Super game involving a Kiwi team. If you genuinely support a Super product going forward you are going to be hoping there are few fans drifting this way. I am tempered a little but by a genuine interest in how Less Kiss goes at the Reds.
Three things have seriously impacted my support:
1. S
hrink to greatness take #1
2. The Rennie European Tour (highlight Italy)
3. The EJ (Eddie Jones) RWC campaign
There is one common thread through that and one only - RA.