Is there any merit in playing an interstate 'club championship' after the Syd, Bris and Canberra comps wrap up for the year?
Imagine the top 3 teams from Syd (e.g. Newcastle, Norths & Randwick at the moment) and Bris (e.g Bond, Easts & Wests), and the top 2 from Canberra (e.g Tuggeranong & Gungahlin) playing a one round home and away plus finals comp after the respective club seasons wrap up. Even if the club season is shortened slightly or brought forward. It could coincide with the end of Super Rugby and the start of Wallaby season, players of national interest could be parachuted in if necessary, and it would still tap into the clubland tribal values and supporter base.
Any thoughts?
I just don’t think this could possibly work.
It has good intentions, but it would destroy the club comps. All the good players would migrate to the perennial qualifiers for this comp, which would lead to thrashings during the season. It has the potential to not involve some players that should be playing at a higher standard because their club doesn’t qualify. And where does the Super Rugby squad players end up? They are the ones that need the game time. Club in my eyes should remain “shamatuer”. Not being disrespectful to them but I think they aren’t the solution to providing the level provided to raise the standard because I don’t think they have the ability to. They are brilliant at grassroots, so let’s not play with that recipe. Otherwise we run the risk of damaging that pipeline as well if clubs suddenly play a role in the pathway they might not be accustomed to, and therefore leaving the grassroots in more a mess than it currently is.
Whatever it looks like, the extra games our non-wallaby players are exposed to needs to be against programs that are 100% professional, against players that are 100% professional (at least for the portion of year the comp and preseason runs) and the facilities need to be elite. Otherwise it’s just not going to move the needle enough to be able to produce caliber of player required in 2023.
One of the issues isn’t the standard of our club players, that’s fine compared to the standard at any other country at an ‘amateur’ level. It’s the standard of the non-wallaby players. They are the ones that need the quality improved. They are the ones that need the investment into them.
Not disparaging your question or passion, as all ideas are valid and perhaps I’m wrong on this issue. I just don’t believe club is the answer to our issues. I’d rather a SRAU run for 8-10 weeks during the international season. So our players involved are living the professional life 24/7, are having deficiencies exposed from coaching staff and analysts watching hours of game tape of them. Having a full 6-8 week preseason. And been penalized for decisions made on the field by players of a standard where if you’re 1% off your game they will capitalize.