KOB1987
John Eales (66)
<Splat> [bounce]
The sound of optimism going all "dead cat".
No I don't think there's anything in it, I just think it's the governing bodies saying 'leave it to us, we're onto it'.
<Splat> [bounce]
The sound of optimism going all "dead cat".
It’s almost certain to be Fox. I don’t think the deal will be as bad as many think as well. It’ll be a reduction but something that could be mitigated through the reduction in travel, a small player wage decrease and reduction in head office costs at both RA and Super Rugby sides.
That's actually a falsehood Wamb. Sorry.
No I don't think there's anything in it, I just think it's the governing bodies saying 'leave it to us, we're onto it'.
The concept that I should be enthused as RA get involved, and the franchises cease discussion, is frankly amusing.
I saw a rumour that English Rugby bosses want the fans to stop singing "Swing low sweet chariot".I would not be unhappy to watch the Wallabies win a game against England off the back of four rolling maul tries....
In fact, it would be beautiful.
And, magically, it all suits Uncle Rupert's interests. This is not how journalism is supposed to work.
Her only beat is Rupert's drum.
And, magically, it all suits Uncle Rupert's interests. This is not how journalism is supposed to work.
Her only beat is Rupert's drum.
That's actually a falsehood Wamb. Sorry.
Okay Rupert
Yes, I can imagine Rupert sitting at home in his grand apartment overlooking Central Park in New York following every detail of the rights to broadcast rugby in Australia. I can see how a man with an estimated wealth of $7.5 billion would consider the rights to broadcast Australian rugby an absolute essential.
Not so long ago the same people on these threads who are now accusing Halloran of a Machiavellian plot to destroy Australian rugby were accusing Fairfax and Georgina Robinson of exactly the same thing. A touch of misogyny perhaps? Rugby types on these threads can't stand females pointing out their deficiencies?
Interestingly these same people are hanging off every word of Wayne Smith, who is apparently a great and insightful rugby journalist offering an unending positive spin on all things rugby in Australia. But hang on Smith works for The Australian which is part of the evil Murdoch empire.
How is it that Murdoch allows Smith to write an avalanche of positivity on the Australian rugby in the News Ltd press? Or is that really that dear old Rupert couldn't care less about RA, and it received negative stories because of its own hopeless administration and performance?
It's very difficult to understand what the fuck you just said.
Yes, I can imagine Rupert sitting at home in his grand apartment overlooking Central Park in New York following every detail of the rights to broadcast rugby in Australia. I can see how a man with an estimated wealth of $7.5 billion would consider the rights to broadcast Australian rugby an absolute essential.
Might want to brush up your history on how the Murdochs conducted themselves during the Super League wars - https://www.afr.com/companies/lachlans-legacy-560m-lost-on-super-league-20050805-jkhav
Pretty obvious to see the same gameplan being rolled out for Rugby..
Hell, look at Foxsport's V'Landys do Lachy's biddings earlier this year to protect the Broncos - https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/mu...second-brisbane-nrl-team-20200227-p544wz.html
Perhaps Rupert isn't watching closely to the negotiation dealings regarding Australian Rugby, but I'd suggest you read up or watch either the TV Show or Movie about Rupert judging Roger Ailes as the perfect candidate to run his tv network. It might help illuminate the type of person that instilled how News Corp is to be run.