I don’t know about destroy but I don’t really know how a concerted agenda of destabilisation can be denied. During the Castle coup, the previously unknown and invisible (to me and many others at least) ‘chief sports writer’ Jessica Halloran seemingly emerged out of nowhere with coup-compliant hit piece after hit piece, supported with backgrounding from some key figures. A frenzy of News retweets from Pandaram et al always swiftly followed. The coup crushed, and some semblance of stability set in place (McLellan, Clarke etc), and Halloran has returned to the state she was in a few months ago - utterly absent and invisible. If no agenda was in place surely she’d still be continuing in her newfound rugby beat and reporting revised comp/2020 broadcast deal/global calendar/Super Rugby NZ news? But no. She flamed out when the coup did.
Can you point out any of these articles which contain materially false information?
RA in significant debt - acknowledged by the interim CEO $9.4 million
RA on verge of bankruptcy - acknowledged by the interim CEO - reliant on WR (World Rugby) loans/advances
RA board losing confidence in Castle - board said it had and then moved her on
RA board divided over Wiggs - confirmed by events
Wiggs threatening to resign - confirmed by events
Wiggs wanted to appoint own CEO - confirmed by events
Wiggs wanted Carroll - confirmed by Carroll
As for backgrounding by "key figures" this is how the world of journalism works - they receive information from insiders and write the story.
If she is "Chief Sports Editor" then the way it works is that she overseas and writes articles on a range of sports, but concentrates on the bigger stories in the range of sports - such as the governing bodies going broke, sacking CEOs, etc. The run of the the mill journos are on particular sports and write the run of the mill articles about day to day events and the editors or senior journos or even sometimes hard news journos come in for the big stories.
Just because you don't like the message, it doesn't make it the fault of the messenger.
If RA wasn't millions in debt, or there wasn't board infighting, or there wasn't the prospect of the CEO being sacked then there would have been no stories to write.
If you had done some research, you would have discovered that she wrote a similar sequence of articles about the funding of Olympic sports pointing out issues in how Sport Australia funds different sports between November and February.
She's not on a rugby beat, she's the sports editor so she moves on to other stories and lets the rugby journos write about the rugby.