Ignoto
Peter Sullivan (51)
NO, but why haven't they been signed off? It isn't because of COVID and that was the previous comment
You speak with such authority on this matter, do your business cards have the 4 squares on them?
NO, but why haven't they been signed off? It isn't because of COVID and that was the previous comment
Fuck off with Folau. Just fuck right off. Its all been said. Gloat somewhere else.The fact that Folau was awarded millions in damages rather suggests that RA was in the wrong.
Honestly, if Castle had just come out with a statement saying that RA didn't agree with his comments but they respected his right to free speech and he wouldn't be sacked, I think the whole controversy would have blown over as soon as the Twitterati moved on to the next thought criminal. In fact, she and the board would probably have won the respect of a great many people for standing up for Folau's freedoms and enhanced the game's reputation.
And then you know what would have happened? We'd have had a stronger team to take to the World Cup. We might have, say, beaten Wales and advanced further in the tournament with an easier path. That level of success might then have spurred further interest in the game domestically .
But we'll never know now. Castle went down the path of appeasing the outrage brigade, cost the sport millions of dollars, and harmed the code's reputation in the process among a great number of casual sports fans.
Oh well.
As for the broadcast rights, I'm not saying that she shouldn't have tried to negotiate but the fact that the game still doesn't have a broadcast partner after all these months is surely an indictment. It was a very generous offer under the circumstances (ie less Australian teams on the table compared to the last negotiation) and frankly I think she had a pretty delusional view of just how popular rugby is in the current environment.
Then again, I think giving herself a 72% mark is pretty delusional in itself. Apparently I'm not the only one (although that report was carried by Newcorp, so no doubt plenty of people here will reflexively dismiss it).
With all that said, thank you for keeping a civil tone. It's very much appreciated.
Micheal, Derpus, you can both get stuffed.
The fact that Folau was awarded millions in damages rather suggests that RA was in the wrong.
What a load of drivel! We all know there were financial issues pre-existing Castle's tenure. Which you conveniently ignore. We know the broadcast deal is fraught, but you act like some "good rugby bloke" is going to find gold in a pile of turds in that sector right now. Fox have been driving the price down, down, down as hard as they can. We know where Folau is, and he got himself there, with a payout ensured by her predecessor. As for the results, we just (almost) got a great coaching team to try to turn things around - which is likely to go down the shitter too. After several previous bosses oversaw the systematic decay in coaching structures in Aus rugby for years.ahh no, its all true matey
where's the financials?
where's the broadcast deal?
where's Israel?
Yes it was mate.Well the post was not factually incorrect. and if you disagree with some ones position it is leftie wankery to then state that..
The fact that Folau was awarded millions in damages rather suggests that RA was in the wrong.
Honestly, if Castle had just come out with a statement saying that RA didn't agree with his comments but they respected his right to free speech and he wouldn't be sacked, I think the whole controversy would have blown over as soon as the Twitterati moved on to the next thought criminal. In fact, she and the board would probably have won the respect of a great many people for standing up for Folau's freedoms and enhanced the game's reputation.
Ah yes, another expert we have amongst us. Please enlighten me how Commercial Litigation and Insurance works.
Sounds like someone who has never been in a proper mediation. It is not at all like this.Folau sued RA.
RA settled.
For millions.
Plus an apology.
Therefore, RA conceded defeat.
Ergo, Folau won.
No expertise required to point out the blooming obvious.
What a load of drivel! We all know there were financial issues pre-existing Castle's tenure. Which you conveniently ignore. We know the broadcast deal is fraught, but you act like some "good rugby bloke" is going to find gold in a pile of turds in that sector right now. Fox have been driving the price down, down, down as hard as they can. We know where Folau is, and he got himself there, with a payout ensured by her predecessor. As for the results, we just (almost) got a great coaching team to try to turn things around - which is likely to go down the shitter too. After several previous bosses oversaw the systematic decay in coaching structures in Aus rugby for years.
So, you're full of shite.
No expertise required to point out the blooming obvious.
OK, stop fucking calling me matey, as I certainly am not.but you do not acknowledge that the financials should have been signed off before the COVId crisis - now you spin the financial issues into pre-existing situation. Facts is facts matey. THe financials which represent the position of the organisation should have been signed off regardless of any pre-existing situation. Why havent the auditors signed off on them? Forget about the rest of it, but we can continue if you want to.
I'll explain how insurance works in these circumstances...Ah yes, another expert we have amongst us. Please enlighten me how Commercial Litigation and Insurance works.