• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

Australian Rugby / RA

hoggy

Nev Cottrell (35)
What happens to reds and Waratahs if we add extra teams into QLD/NSW?

The suggestion of a national competition is just the NRC but lipstick on a pig.

plus - the drua might decide to just go play with the New Zealanders
Sadly pig lipstick is all we can afford, because we spent like a drunken sailor for twenty years.

The Waratahs become the Sydney Waratahs, the Reds become the Brisbane Reds, and I hope the Drua pick Australia.
 

Dan54

David Wilson (68)
Most will know my views over decades, that Super Rugby was the wrong way to structure a competition hoping to capture an Australia wide audience or even maintain existing status.
Mate I know where you coming from etc but this bit I have copied from your post shows where you got it so wrong. Super rugby was actually incredibly successful when it started, and in Australia (I lived there then) and indeed captured as wide an ausdience as you could hope for, rugby was front and centre of
 

hifflepiff

Charlie Fox (21)
Mate I know where you coming from etc but this bit I have copied from your post shows where you got it so wrong. Super rugby was actually incredibly successful when it started, and in Australia (I lived there then) and indeed captured as wide an ausdience as you could hope for, rugby was front and centre of
Mate you've got it back to front.

Super Rugby was successful when it started because it began at the absolute peak of Union's popularity in Aus.

But Super Rugby has done nothing to build on that popularity. In fact I would argue it's one of the major reasons Union has fallen off a cliff in this country over the past two decades.
 

SouthernX

John Thornett (49)
Qld x2
Sydney/NSW x3
Act x2
Melbourne x1
Perth x1
Fiji x1

No fricken way there’s 2 ACT teams

they already have a poaching issue in the nations capital where they can’t develop their own so they have to pick players from QLD, NSW and VIC.

Would make more sense to have a team in Darwin tbh.
 

dru

David Wilson (68)
No fricken way there’s 2 ACT teams

they already have a poaching issue in the nations capital where they can’t develop their own so they have to pick players from QLD, NSW and VIC.

Would make more sense to have a team in Darwin tbh.

9 then.

Still I’d take the Vikings to top up the broader Brumby squad as it is and think I’d go close to two National teams. Happy to bow to your thoughts and start 9.
 

Mick The Munch

Vay Wilson (31)
The way I see it, we are never going to compete with Japan, Europe so don;t bother, careers are short and the national team isn't priority. Let the internationals go (can still play for the Wallabies), use an Aus comp for up and comers.

Super Rugby is always going to be loss making on that basis, so unless you can find rich benefactors who can use the national coverage for promotion why try to compete with overseas - create passion with a local comp
 

hoggy

Nev Cottrell (35)
9 then.

Still I’d take the Vikings to top up the broader Brumby squad as it is and think I’d go close to two National teams. Happy to bow to your thoughts and start 9.
if you take the 5 existing teams add one in NSW & QLD, retain the Drua, you have a workable 8 team competition. Given time that could become 10 teams (5-15 year time frame)

Problem is were broke, so why didn't we do this sometime over the last 10 years when we actually had a couple bucks in the bank and the odd supporter or two.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dru

SouthernX

John Thornett (49)
if you take the 5 existing teams add one in NSW & QLD, retain the Drua, you have a workable 8 team competition. Given time that could become 10 teams (5-15 year time frame)

Problem is were broke, so why didn't we do this sometime over the last 10 years when we actually had a couple bucks in the bank and the odd supporter or two.

The plan is pretty much the NRC comp.
The NRC is a twice failed 3rd tier comp.

I bet those broadcasters are chomping at the bit at this proposal.
 

Mick The Munch

Vay Wilson (31)
if you take the 5 existing teams add one in NSW & QLD, retain the Drua, you have a workable 8 team competition. Given time that could become 10 teams (5-15 year time frame)

Problem is were broke, so why didn't we do this sometime over the last 10 years when we actually had a couple bucks in the bank and the odd supporter or two.
Because it's been run by people whose main interest is their fiefdom.
 

hoggy

Nev Cottrell (35)
The plan is pretty much the NRC comp.
The NRC is a twice failed 3rd tier comp.

I bet those broadcasters are chomping at the bit at this proposal.
NO, it failed because it was a reserve grade development competition designed to support Super Rugby, it was never going to be attractive to broadcasters, you can't sell them your B competition.

Those broadcasters aren't chomping at the bit now, and as I said above reality is a bummer. but we are in this situation because we stuffed up the last 20 years.
You want Australian rugby to grow & prosper then you have to plant the seed and do the hard work first.
 

SouthernX

John Thornett (49)
If it is intended as the primary 2nd tier comp then it is not the NRC comp.

Broadcasters don't give a shit about any rugby outside of Tests.

& test rugby takes a huge hit because players from Oz and NZ leave in droves.

They’ll need to sort out eligibility laws with wallabies and all blacks to keep the Bledisloe the best of the best spectacle of Tasman Rugby.
 

SouthernX

John Thornett (49)
Scrap eligibility laws, look at South Africa

Honestly don’t think it’s that simple.

french and Japanese rugby just going to let their star players take a quick flight back to Australia for a test match?

South Africa was able to upgrade from super rugby to the northern hemisphere club comp backed by big broadcast deals… our saviour Is Stan sports
 
Top