Brumby Runner
Jason Little (69)
Not at all. At least, not until we know exactly what is meant by Centralisation.Is that not, in all likelihood, a presumably valid conclusion though?
Not at all. At least, not until we know exactly what is meant by Centralisation.Is that not, in all likelihood, a presumably valid conclusion though?
I think it's fair to assume that one of the review's core recommendations is likely to focus on the need for alignment (and improvement) of high performance programs across the country - i.e., the central tenet to RA's proposed model.Not at all. At least, not until we know exactly what is meant by Centralisation.
Hear Hear! He was my favourite player growing up. In such a star-studded backline for Queensland and Wallabies he was just a no nonsense, understated but key player. And everything he has done since has seemed to have mirrored his role on the field.I will hear no ill-talk of Slacky!
Besides he was a coach in the modern professional era, has had board positions etc with QRU and ARU, is still very much involved with the younger generation (probably not widely know but he is a pseudo mentor for a bunch of the young Reds backs - spends a lot of time with Jock, Jordy, Lynagh etc) and is just genuinely one of the good guys with no agendas and just wants the best for the game.
We've had a shitton of reviews commissioned before into the wider system of Australian Rugby. Inevitably, they always come to the same conclusion:I still don't see what the terms of reference/scope for this review is/are with much clarity. The issues with the Wallabies goes far and wide and historical, so in my view this review needs to look into the schools, clubs, coaching programs, State bodies, Super 15 involvement, national and State high performance operations at a minimum. If I was involved, I would add the role/influence of player-managers. I'll wait for the call from Phil W.
I have asked a senior person within the AIS about what they think of how rugby conducts itself.Hopefully Darlene Harrison can provide some insight into the changes that Swimming Australia and Rowing Australia (the two I can think of and I would imagine work in concert with the AIS) have implemented over the last 5 years that have resulted in very impressive performances on the world stage. The same could be said for the AIS' Basketball program - which I think Basketball Australia technically control now but they're based in Canberra. Some pretty impressive alumni of late.
I know Rowing Australia have been helped by Gina's $$$ but I'm sure there have been a number of changes made on the high performance front that could be of benefit to rugby. Perhaps she doesn't have intimate details of this but I'm sure she could source the expertise.
I have asked a senior person within the AIS about what they think of how rugby conducts itself.
Without hesitation they said rugbys greatest short coming is it picks it future players as teenagers 14, 15, 16 year olds from a very small group of earlier (physical) developers.
What you need is a good structure to develop players up until the age of about 23 and forget about all these pathway managers for teenagers. They are a sinful waste of money that could be better spent elsewhere.
I don't know anything about the pathways but don't we try and pick them young so we can secure them in the future. Sounds like what the dude says makes sense. But by then they are most likely not rugby players i think?I have asked a senior person within the AIS about what they think of how rugby conducts itself.
Without hesitation they said rugbys greatest short coming is it picks it future players as teenagers 14, 15, 16 year olds from a very small group of earlier (physical) developers.
What you need is a good structure to develop players up until the age of about 23 and forget about all these pathway managers for teenagers. They are a sinful waste of money that could be better spent elsewhere.
This is no different to almost every sport and tbh 9/10 it works. Almost every major pro league sport in the world have this approach now.I have asked a senior person within the AIS about what they think of how rugby conducts itself.
Without hesitation they said rugbys greatest short coming is it picks it future players as teenagers 14, 15, 16 year olds from a very small group of earlier (physical) developers.
What you need is a good structure to develop players up until the age of about 23 and forget about all these pathway managers for teenagers. They are a sinful waste of money that could be better spent elsewhere.
Didn't realise the other discussion was on the NPC thread so moving it here as seems more appropriate.
Was digging around for some info on the Irish development system and came across this report from 2019. Seems the private/elite school development system works for Ireland because of the greater, more consistent, control they get over young aspirant pro players. idk how you can reconcile that with a more egalitarian schools structure where players would be more distributed and less supervised.
Irish Rugby Player Pathway | Evolution of a Player Development System - Setanta College Blog
Former Director of Fitness with the IRFU, Dr. Liam Hennessy, looks at the creation and evolution of the Irish Rugby's Player Development System (LTAD).www.setantacollege.com
Where players come from
Players that go on to represent their country seem to come from key schools as they transition through the provincial sub-academies and academies to the professional game. Typically between 70% and 85% of players who represent Ireland graduate upwards from these key schools. The close link between schools and the academies and their outreach regions (mainly clubs) in particular seems to be the true ‘key’ in the pathway of development. For example, the Leinster sub-academy has what can only be considered an outstanding conversion rate of 85% to the professional game. Of significance is also the fact that approximately 65% of the current Irish international players come through the Leinster sub-academy spearheaded since its founding by Dave Fagan. While this is a great tribute to the work of Dave and his colleagues, it does highlight a possible gap in other development sections. Once addressed they can also contribute to a greater extent to the development of elite players.
Longevity
Of all the markers that can be used to assess the effectiveness of a development pathway, a player’s longevity at the highest level of the game is one that reflects a more holistic reference that combines several important yet often unappreciated demands on the player. The factors that we have seen that impact on the years spent plying their trade include their early period of development, their capacity to limit injury incidence, the management of their game number in any given year, their lifestyle approach and their, would you believe, sleep quality/duration.
Several other factors such as fitness levels and physical measurements such as stature, body weight, and body fat were considered. Also included were other markers associated with mood. The surprising outcome however was that the single biggest contributor to a long career was the years devoted to physical development before starting on a professional contract. We call this ‘Training Age’ and this seems to be one of the main factors in influencing and impacting the longevity of a pro player in Ireland. In simple terms, the more years spent under a supervised fitness specialist such as a strength and conditioning coach, the greater the possibility of having an extended career as a player.
Workload
One other major finding, and one which will raise some eyebrows, is that it seems that those players who completed a higher workload in the late teen years and in their early 20’s seem to have also gained an advantage in terms of their capacity to endure a career in the professional game. While this is not the first time that we have found this ‘paradoxical’ relationship between workload and performance (Hogan and Jordan 2016), it is one which will no doubt prompt discussion as to how much work is required during the development stage to become a robust player in team sports.
Summary
The development of the Irish Rugby player over the last 3 decades was initiated by Stephen Aboud, who is now the Italian Rugby Technical Director. He and his colleagues within coaching, fitness, physiotherapy, and nutritional fields guided this development pathway long before a formal staged pathway (LTAD) was popularised in the 2000s.
In assessing the evolution of the pathway it is clear that Ireland has benefitted significantly from this early phase of player development. It may surprise many but there is still a limited number of schools who literally produce the majority of Ireland’s players.
From this structured development, where training age is increased especially from the junior stage through to the final secondary school year, players then transition to the sub-academy within the provinces. These academies are arguably the most productive academies in the world of team sports. There are still opportunities to forge a more effective development pathway, mainly through continued and greater support of schools, (sub) academies, and more focused support of clubs at all stages of development. Nevertheless, the current synergy between schools and academies is seen as a world-class development pathway, regardless of the limitation in player numbers.
Every sport does this, if you look at Aussie rules half of the guys that play in the ruck in early years of rep footy and pathway teams never make it to 6ft. It’s part of the reason why they tell you big fellas take a while to develop at senior level as most of them are later entrances to the pathway programs.I have asked a senior person within the AIS about what they think of how rugby conducts itself.
Without hesitation they said rugbys greatest short coming is it picks it future players as teenagers 14, 15, 16 year olds from a very small group of earlier (physical) developers.
What you need is a good structure to develop players up until the age of about 23 and forget about all these pathway managers for teenagers. They are a sinful waste of money that could be better spent elsewhere.
You really shouldn’t need to.I wonder if weight for age in the junior ranks would help with this? It might shake people from the belief that just picking the big kids is best and maybe force these boys to work more on their skills.
AIS spend a lot of money identifying and training athletes who dominate at their age through physical development. Wether it be T&F, Diving, Basketball, Gymnastics etc.
But is the AIS actively finding these athletes I.e. Going out to whatever grass roots games are going on and plucking kids from there?
Or, are they simply relying on kids to be partaking in a sport that competes at a State and National level and redirecting them from doing Basketball to Rowing, Gymnastics to Volleyball etc based on attributes that the person has which is better suited for a different sport.
They had a set of metrics that they were measuring them against for each sport like rowing, and based on the results kids were invited into training camps for then relevant sport/discipline in which they displayed attributes for.
Not sure how much of active seeking is going on now. We always hear about the Aerial skiing and how they pluck them from gymnastics.But is the AIS actively finding these athletes I.e. Going out to whatever grass roots games are going on and plucking kids from there?
Or, are they simply relying on kids to be partaking in a sport that competes at a State and National level and redirecting them from doing Basketball to Rowing, Gymnastics to Volleyball etc based on attributes that the person has which is better suited for a different sport.
Unsure if it still exists, but years ago the AIS had a program where they went to schools and ran kids through physical testing and benchmarking. They had a set of metrics that they were measuring them against for each sport like rowing, and based on the results kids were invited into training camps for then relevant sport/discipline in which they displayed attributes for.
Kids were then invited into development squads with AIS, the squads got smaller and smaller as they progressed through.
these were sports that the kids had never played before. Unsure if it eventuated in any elite level success.
This was me, they identified a group of us that were excelling in certain physical aspects. We went to a location where they conducted extensive testing from wing span to power with tests like sitting down and pushing a medicine ball as far as you could go, vertical leap, etc. We then went to an AIS funded location with several presentations provided us with potentially sporting pathways from our physical attributes. I would have been 14 at the time. I was probably a little too self absorbed with my rugby at the time but many in the wider group went on to represent Australia at the Olympics in sports they had never played before.Unsure if it still exists, but years ago the AIS had a program where they went to schools and ran kids through physical testing and benchmarking. They had a set of metrics that they were measuring them against for each sport like rowing, and based on the results kids were invited into training camps for then relevant sport/discipline in which they displayed attributes for.
Kids were then invited into development squads with AIS, the squads got smaller and smaller as they progressed through.
these were sports that the kids had never played before. Unsure if it eventuated in any elite level success.