So what you're saying is there's still an outside chance I could have a tug over it?
Not if Lord Byron gets to it first.
So what you're saying is there's still an outside chance I could have a tug over it?
A couple of days ago. Mostly to help clean up spam posts.
Without wanting to sound like a suck-up, B.Ravesheart is an excellent choice of moderator. So much common sense. I can only marvel at the sensical brain machinations involved in weighing reason and sense to conjure posts that result in some sort of miracle of rationale and reason and common sense and wft the other things I don't understand
FWIW, I don't really intend to participate in the conversation too much but I think the Folau thread should be reopened given this new development so people can vent there rather than pollute other threads with it
Company directors can be liable for debts or tax obligations if they knowingly allow the company to continue 'trading' while insolvent.I cant see how they are liable for anymore than their share of his salary.
They were liable for that before this blew up.
It’s RA that have terminated him, it’s they that would be liable for any damages he might be awarded for his loss of income from other sources.
I genuinely had no idea that you didn’t use cream in carbonara.It’s also been suggested that the earth is flat, and that you can add cream to a carbonara.....
I genuinely had no idea that you didn’t use cream in carbonara.
I was responding to a post suggesting that might be a risk that Tahs not RA directors might be facing.Company directors can be liable for debts or tax obligations if they knowingly allow the company to continue 'trading' while insolvent.
I have no idea whether RA are close to insolvency or not. Seems unlikely though.
Can we reopen the Folau thread ? Why cant we discuss it ? I know I have employees who have the same views as Israel and some dont , nobody lost their job, no clients walked away, we all get along.
Can we reopen the Folau thread ? Why cant we discuss it ? I know I have employees who have the same views as Israel and some dont , nobody lost their job, no clients walked away, we all get along.
What gave you that idea?Im sorry I thought all humans were equal
Im sorry I thought all humans were equal
Yes interesting that. Though such people have always had flexible ethics and integrity.This is actually a very good example of my objection to the Folau saga. I don't give a shit about what Folau posted. I actually don't care about what Derpus posted above beyond its ability to convey the very point I was making in my whole stance on this matter. The ability to be offended and achieve sanction against the offender is obviously now restricted to "abuse" directed at approved minority groups. The problem then becomes who approves what is offensive and who can be offended.Much better if as Haidt has says we become resilient and learn to live outside.
Im sorry I thought all humans were equal
I thought it was pretty clear I was referring to Jonathan Haidt given I quoted only that line of your post.
Your are 100% correct that I know nothing about you which is why my post was not in reference to you personally in any way.
I'm sorry if you thought I was commenting about you specifically. I thought it was pretty clear that I wasn't.
Anyway, nice rant with a few attempts at insults directed at me.
I was responding to a post suggesting that might be a risk that Tahs not RA directors might be facing.
Pretty sure Tahs would have a RA reliance clause in their annual accounts as well.