Beale looks far from professional despite being well paid
Initially I thought that one of the most esteemed, lucid, modest, insightful and wondrously self-deprecating oracles of rugby had written a piece analysing the whole Kurtley Beale saga and giving sage advice to both KB (Kurtley Beale) and the ARU from someone, who having experienced playing rugby at the state level and above, is far better qualified to offer it than anyone else:
http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-union/u...l-despite-being-well-paid-20130330-2h02f.html
However, when wading through this piece I thought, hang on Elfster, it may just be another piece of genuine self-reflection and analysis by Matt, almost autobiographical:
"
Don't get me wrong, there have been selfish players around in every era, but my comments are aimed at the self-centred. Those who see themselves as the axis of a team with everything else rotating around them.
However I may be too harsh on Matt and missed his point entirely, but if there was ever an article looking for a sub-editor, this was one. A more fitting, precise and definitely less self-indulgent piece would have been a far more effective piece in this case, as I do actually agree with the basic premise of his article.