• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

Argentina v Australia II @ 5.10am 14/08

Status
Not open for further replies.

molman

Jim Lenehan (48)
Absolutely. They are making hay in unstructured play. Then they use an accurate high ball to create that opportunity. Add in some back to back penalty scenarios and that is the first half.

Oh, add poor set piece handing possession over by Australia.
I'm not even sure some of their high balls have been that accurate or specifically high quality, just need to get it in the general zone. They have pace in the team so their chasers are getting there irrespective of quality. The track is hard so the ball runs and bounces. Anything other than a clean take from the Wallabies is essentially a win. Low risk, high reward.
 

dru

David Wilson (68)
I'm not even sure some of their high balls have been that accurate or specifically high quality, just need to get it in the general zone. They have pace in the team so their chasers are getting there irrespective of quality. The track is hard so the ball runs and bounces. Anything other than a clean take from the Wallabies is essentially a win. Low risk, high reward.

Agree. It's not just the outside backs either (plus 9/10 if they are back). it's that the rest of the team losses cohesion in the position for D as ball sails overhead. We need a couple of phases for the D to structure and that can be too late.
 

molman

Jim Lenehan (48)
Agree. It's not just the outside backs either (plus 9/10 if they are back). it's that the rest of the team losses cohesion in the position for D as ball sails overhead. We need a couple of phases for the D to structure and that can be too late.
Unfortunately for us, it's not an area (the high ball) that has been a specific strength of the Wallabies since the Folau days. Banks had improved and generally was looking more assured.
 

dru

David Wilson (68)
Poor call by Wright to run there but honest, how many microseconds did he hold it for?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top