Gary Smith
Stan Wickham (3)
Can anyone sum up all four games from the weekend with scores etc.?
To sum up Padua's victory over Laurie's is a tough one, both teams playing extremely well with Laurie's being dominant in every aspect except for the scoring tries part. In the last 10 minutes SLC were on Padua's line with forward momentum where the referee made a debatable call of hands in the ruck even though the player was simply picking and driving his own ball. This caused Padua to make a clearance kick off a line out where the number 9 Laurie's player called a mark but the referee did not allow it. Therefor Padua with building pressure got over the line. This however fired the Laurie's boys up with an almost immediate return try to have the boys back to 6 points down, but unfortunately, in the last 3 minutes, Padua collected a sloppy ball from Laurie's causing a full field runaway try down the sideline. Definently an improvement from the men in black, star players including Ed dennin(second row/flanker) Tom Beikoff on debut (second row/ flanker) and Ian Fillipo (fullback) dispite his poor decisions throughout the game, a very good game. Laurie's have finally found their feet
I thought quiet the opposite after watching this game on the weekend, it was a very even game throughout the first half with no team really dominating territory or possession. However in the second half padua's forward pack seemed to be too fit for the Lauries boys and ran them around the park. Lauries turned over too much ball and Padua took full advantage. Padua came away with a comfortable win letting many 2nds and 16a players to finish out the last 5 minutes with ease.To sum up Padua's victory over Laurie's is a tough one, both teams playing extremely well with Laurie's being dominant in every aspect except for the scoring tries part. In the last 10 minutes SLC were on Padua's line with forward momentum where the referee made a debatable call of hands in the ruck even though the player was simply picking and driving his own ball. This caused Padua to make a clearance kick off a line out where the number 9 Laurie's player called a mark but the referee did not allow it. Therefor Padua with building pressure got over the line. This however fired the Laurie's boys up with an almost immediate return try to have the boys back to 6 points down, but unfortunately, in the last 3 minutes, Padua collected a sloppy ball from Laurie's causing a full field runaway try down the sideline. Definently an improvement from the men in black, star players including Ed dennin(second row/flanker) Tom Beikoff on debut (second row/ flanker) and Ian Fillipo (fullback) dispite his poor decisions throughout the game, a very good game. Laurie's have finally found their feet
Don't forget to remember some boys will play confra rather then play in the AIC 1 team, I know most 1st boys from eddies and Padua will play in the confra comp over AIC
confro is held on a different date to AIC this year
Evening AIC Rugby fans,
A little about me -
I've read this feed for a while yet have never commented and now i feel it is about time. I wish to see AIC rugby at a highly competitive level, where all schools enter every round with the optimism that they can come out winners, I also believe money and facilities should not be pumped into schoolboy rugby at only a 1st XV level (if at all) which some schools seem to do. I love rugby union, and I love AIC rugby, it has a modesty yet a greatness and pride about it that I loved being a part of and hope my sons can too.
Qualms with this feed-
I would like to bring to light a topic of conversation frequenting this feed that I find rather disturbing. The AIC (Associated Independent Colleges) is exactly that, a competition of colleges. The comments with which I have qualms include those such as "The golden age of Ashgrove Rugby is over", combined with "No longer does Marist dominate the AIC".
In round one of the AIC Competition 2014 Marist College Ashgrove fielded 30 rugby teams with reserves, a number that has not declined as the rounds have progressed. On that day, against St Pats, one of these thirty teams lost (1st XV). In round two, against Laurie's, one of these thirty teams lost (14A's). In round three, St Edmunds College won one game against Ashgrove (1st XV), this game was not only the only game they won, but they only game where Ashgrove conceded a point. And I pray to God for the Villa teams from the 13D's to the 2nd XV playing Ashgrove next week, and only he knows what poor St Peters will suffer. When I was playing AIC rugby Ashgrove was a massive threat, every week, for every school. They've never lost an aggregate and won't this year either. Ashgrove Rugby is anything but dead.
Schools like St Peters boast they have a flourishing rugby program, they're wrong. They have a flourishing 1st XV program I will admit, but they achieve this by going against the rules the seven other sports masters abide by. St Peters rugby doesn't win, their 1st's do and the students lose because of it.
A warning -
Just because a schools first XV don't win doesn't mean they're not a competitive rugby college.
To those out there thinking Marist rugby is dead, you're dead wrong. I talk to the younger Ashgrove players when they are playing in my neck of the woods as I do with all schools. They love their rugby, they love playing rugby, the winning is just a by-product. I give full credit to the young sports master Phillip Holding for the work he has done there over the past few years, the strong holistic approach Marist College Ashgrove takes to its rugby and all its sports under his direction will fuel 1st XV seasons for years to come.
I look forward to having a chat about this, and let the best teams win this Saturday.
Interesting to note about Ashgrove. How many kids do they have there? The mentality of most teams approaching the fixture with Ashgrove is already resigned to defeat. From what I've seen, Ashgrove teams possess a lot more confidence and belief in themselves compared to most. This belief is probably a product of the school's culture as mush as it is gained from winning games. Im sure that because of the reputation that the school has simply attracts better players of at least more players of quality, too.
Evening AIC Rugby fans,
A little about me -
I've read this feed for a while yet have never commented and now i feel it is about time. I wish to see AIC rugby at a highly competitive level, where all schools enter every round with the optimism that they can come out winners, I also believe money and facilities should not be pumped into schoolboy rugby at only a 1st XV level (if at all) which some schools seem to do. I love rugby union, and I love AIC rugby, it has a modesty yet a greatness and pride about it that I loved being a part of and hope my sons can too.
Qualms with this feed-
I would like to bring to light a topic of conversation frequenting this feed that I find rather disturbing. The AIC (Associated Independent Colleges) is exactly that, a competition of colleges. The comments with which I have qualms include those such as "The golden age of Ashgrove Rugby is over", combined with "No longer does Marist dominate the AIC".
In round one of the AIC Competition 2014 Marist College Ashgrove fielded 30 rugby teams with reserves, a number that has not declined as the rounds have progressed. On that day, against St Pats, one of these thirty teams lost (1st XV). In round two, against Laurie's, one of these thirty teams lost (14A's). In round three, St Edmunds College won one game against Ashgrove (1st XV), this game was not only the only game they won, but they only game where Ashgrove conceded a point. And I pray to God for the Villa teams from the 13D's to the 2nd XV playing Ashgrove next week, and only he knows what poor St Peters will suffer. When I was playing AIC rugby Ashgrove was a massive threat, every week, for every school. They've never lost an aggregate and won't this year either. Ashgrove Rugby is anything but dead.
Schools like St Peters boast they have a flourishing rugby program, they're wrong. They have a flourishing 1st XV program I will admit, but they achieve this by going against the rules the seven other sports masters abide by. St Peters rugby doesn't win, their 1st's do and the students lose because of it.
A warning -
Just because a schools first XV don't win doesn't mean they're not a competitive rugby college.
To those out there thinking Marist rugby is dead, you're dead wrong. I talk to the younger Ashgrove players when they are playing in my neck of the woods as I do with all schools. They love their rugby, they love playing rugby, the winning is just a by-product. I give full credit to the young sports master Phillip Holding for the work he has done there over the past few years, the strong holistic approach Marist College Ashgrove takes to its rugby and all its sports under his direction will fuel 1st XV seasons for years to come.
I look forward to having a chat about this, and let the best teams win this Saturday.
Evening AIC Rugby fans,
A little about me -
I've read this feed for a while yet have never commented and now i feel it is about time. I wish to see AIC rugby at a highly competitive level, where all schools enter every round with the optimism that they can come out winners, I also believe money and facilities should not be pumped into schoolboy rugby at only a 1st XV level (if at all) which some schools seem to do. I love rugby union, and I love AIC rugby, it has a modesty yet a greatness and pride about it that I loved being a part of and hope my sons can too.
Qualms with this feed-
I would like to bring to light a topic of conversation frequenting this feed that I find rather disturbing. The AIC (Associated Independent Colleges) is exactly that, a competition of colleges. The comments with which I have qualms include those such as "The golden age of Ashgrove Rugby is over", combined with "No longer does Marist dominate the AIC".
In round one of the AIC Competition 2014 Marist College Ashgrove fielded 30 rugby teams with reserves, a number that has not declined as the rounds have progressed. On that day, against St Pats, one of these thirty teams lost (1st XV). In round two, against Laurie's, one of these thirty teams lost (14A's). In round three, St Edmunds College won one game against Ashgrove (1st XV), this game was not only the only game they won, but they only game where Ashgrove conceded a point. And I pray to God for the Villa teams from the 13D's to the 2nd XV playing Ashgrove next week, and only he knows what poor St Peters will suffer. When I was playing AIC rugby Ashgrove was a massive threat, every week, for every school. They've never lost an aggregate and won't this year either. Ashgrove Rugby is anything but dead.
Schools like St Peters boast they have a flourishing rugby program, they're wrong. They have a flourishing 1st XV program I will admit, but they achieve this by going against the rules the seven other sports masters abide by. St Peters rugby doesn't win, their 1st's do and the students lose because of it.
A warning -
Just because a schools first XV don't win doesn't mean they're not a competitive rugby college.
To those out there thinking Marist rugby is dead, you're dead wrong. I talk to the younger Ashgrove players when they are playing in my neck of the woods as I do with all schools. They love their rugby, they love playing rugby, the winning is just a by-product. I give full credit to the young sports master Phillip Holding for the work he has done there over the past few years, the strong holistic approach Marist College Ashgrove takes to its rugby and all its sports under his direction will fuel 1st XV seasons for years to come.
I look forward to having a chat about this, and let the best teams win this Saturday.
Ladder after round 3Could someone please provide myself and this forum with official scores from last weekend and a updated ladder? It would much appreciated!
Round 4 tips
Pats in a thrilled
Eddies by plenty
Ashgrove by 10
Iona by 15
Great post. Upon speaking to a leading rugby official at St Pats the other day he agreed with this. However, he pointed out to me the marked improvement in the school's "A" performances. Obviously the big talking point of the day was the school's first win over Marist in 63 years, but he was more impressed with the school's performance throughout. Yes, 1sts were the only side to get a W but the 13A, 14A and 15A lost by a combined total of five points I believe, with one of the results being a draw (15A?). For each of the St Pats "A" sides to achieve this is exemplary of the school's improvement. Gone are the days where there was only one competitive side in the whole school, circa 2011.
I 100% agree with you that the domination of the yellow and blue continues, but the margin is closing ever so slightly year after year as rugby culture grows at other schools that are yet to tap their potential.
Next step, getting the "B" and "C" sides to buy in to the culture as well.
Hmmmm? Pats have certainly made some huge improvements with their A teams whilst I sure culture, coaches etc have contribute to this improvement,
lets also note that "special" students have also made a huge impact.
Those "special" students don't play in B and C teams.
Similar to Peters 1st team,the only team within the school capable of winning an AIC game.
Pats has just spread this "special" students over more age groups ( which IMO is a better approach to the Peters way of doing it)
so now we have a new school involved in the arms race.