• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

2022 Bledisloe Cup. Wallabies vs All Blacks

Status
Not open for further replies.

Brumby Runner

Jason Little (69)
Our biggest issue for the last couple of tests has been throwing. If that improves we should be fine.

It doesn't matter how tall our jumpers are if we're getting picked off by someone in front because the throw is too low.
I disagree to some extent BH. In one of the tests against SA (I think the first), at least four, maybe more lineouts were lost by the catcher knocking on in the air. Those throws went straight to the catcher who nevertheless spilt them and turned over possession. Both throws and catches have been less than satisfactory in recent games and I have little confidence it will be significantly better on Thursday. Porecki probably has a similar proportion of wayward throws as FF (Folau Fainga'a) over a number of tests and our catchers in this test are quite a bit shorter than earlier combinations.

We shall see while hoping for the best.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dru

dru

David Wilson (68)
I disagree to some extent BH. In one of the tests against SA (I think the first), at least four, maybe more lineouts were lost by the catcher knocking on in the air. Those throws went straight to the catcher who nevertheless spilt them and turned over possession. Both throws and catches have been less than satisfactory in recent games and I have little confidence it will be significantly better on Thursday. Porecki probably has a similar proportion of wayward throws as FF (Folau Fainga'a) (Folau Fainga'a) over a number of tests and our catchers in this test are quite a bit shorter than earlier combinations.

We shall see while hoping for the best.

This.
 

cyclopath

George Smith (75)
Staff member
Only big surprise I see is Samu in for McReight; moderately surprised Hodge is benched and Holloway at 4 (he has played well at lock this year). I'd have been shocked if a complete newbie got picked at 10, and if Lolesio, Cooper and O'Connor were all available Foley would not be in the mix. Not surprised White got a minor rest, but would not have been upset if he started. Let's face it, we are missing some important personnel.
I think the ABs will give us a real touch-up this week.
 

Dismal Pillock

Michael Lynagh (62)
If he can't rack up 50 against us, they should fire him.
NEVER underestimate this man's capacity to lose rugby football matches.

1661738633220-removebg-preview.png
 

tragic

John Solomon (38)
I’d rather hodge at 10 than pop gun foley. We’ll get pinned in our 22 and the ABs will rack up a cricket score.
I’m having PTSD flashbacks already
 

eastman

John Solomon (38)
Rennie's in a pretty difficult position and can never really win with these selections. We've got multiple players unavailable and just came off a hiding from South Africa where people on this forum were screaming for changes to the team, and Rennie has basically obliged.

All the unforced changes are arguably justified; White was poor, Hodge was ok but held to such warped/ low standards, where he is praised for not being shit and Samu has been consistently strong off the bench so he's probably due a start.

It's not like we were going to win with White and Hodge starting- so why not give some other players the opportunity.
 

eastman

John Solomon (38)
I don’t mind the choice of Foley at 10 and am looking forward to seeing him play. However putting him in between Gordon and Foketi behind a pack that does not look great on paper is not doing him any favours. It will be sink or swim. Hopefully the back row muscles up and we get some decent front foot ball.
You could argue that putting Foley between Gordon and Foketi won't do the other two any favours either.
 

footy1>31

Charlie Fox (21)
more casual observer of rugby in aus than I was years ago, but full credit to RA for having the balls to put the test on a Thu. A heap more casual eyeballs to celebrate Nard carry the boys home
 

fatprop

George Gregan (70)
Staff member
more casual observer of rugby in aus than I was years ago, but full credit to Rugby Australia for having the balls to put the test on a Thu. A heap more casual eyeballs to celebrate Nard carry the boys home
you can see the channel 9 influence, mid week special occasion entertainment is their bread and butter
 

stillmissit

Peter Johnson (47)
Rennie's in a pretty difficult position and can never really win with these selections. We've got multiple players unavailable and just came off a hiding from South Africa where people on this forum were screaming for changes to the team, and Rennie has basically obliged.

It's not like we were going to win with White and Hodge starting- so why not give some other players the opportunity.
I don't think obliging us is the right way to coach. I am concerned about our team going forward and I think the next 2 Bled games should give us an indication that Rennie has a plan. At the moment I can't see that plan and who is standing up regularly to be the spine of the team.
Rennie is either totally useless (don't believe that) or he is confused in terms of injuries and who are our best players outside of Koro, Kellaway and Bobby V.
That leaves us with 4-7 forwards to be identified and you can't win without a strong pack.
 

stillmissit

Peter Johnson (47)
A lot of talk about kicking and who should be 9,10.12.
The biggest issue in my book is how the pack is going to get go-forward ball and how the hell we are going to win the breakdown. I will be watching Pete Samu closely to see what he brings but I think we will miss McRight. We have a bigger backrow so let's hope that they impact the breakdown and give the backs an opportunity to do their stuff.
NZ 15 Wallabies 7. Predicting a hard-fought effort from our guys (backs against the wall stuff) but not quite enough to win.
 

Dctarget

Tim Horan (67)
A lot of talk about kicking and who should be 9,10.12.
The biggest issue in my book is how the pack is going to get go-forward ball and how the hell we are going to win the breakdown. I will be watching Pete Samu closely to see what he brings but I think we will miss McRight. We have a bigger backrow so let's hope that they impact the breakdown and give the backs an opportunity to do their stuff.
NZ 15 Wallabies 7. Predicting a hard-fought effort from our guys (backs against the wall stuff) but not quite enough to win.
We've shipped an average of 29 points this championship. Would be surprised if we kept them under 40.
 

Viking

Mark Ella (57)
I like the backrow, it seems larger and more impactful which should help at the breakdown. We lose McReight but if Samu has similar impact to his bench cameos and can up his work-rate a bit then he might actually be a better option.

Likewise, I think Holloway at lock is better in the contact zone then Swain, although we lose Swains lineout and maul prowess. Arnold hasn't done much so I'm not sure he's a big loss. Overall I think the forwards are geared towards winning the contact zone.

Porecki should help the line-out, which is a bit of a worry with no Arnold or Swain, as the jumpers feel a bit small. But that's the sacrifice it seems we are making for having the bigger bodies or players better in that contact zone - which is the first step in winning the breakdown.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top