• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

2022 Bledisloe Cup. Wallabies vs All Blacks

Status
Not open for further replies.

PhilClinton

Mark Loane (55)
Is that actually against the rules?
They called it a wreckless play which endangered a player. I’m not sure ‘diving at legs’ would be written specifically in the rules.

In the NRL it’s a pretty clear cut cannonball tackle and would likely be a send off. In basketball it would result in an ejection. I think it’s in line with how most sports treat that type of play.
 

Shiggins

Simon Poidevin (60)
Everyones acting like.he just saw the leg and went at it to break it. He was using his upper body and trying to get under and all lift as he fell. It's a rugby incident
 

Kenny Powers

Ron Walden (29)
Dave Rennie needs to make IQ tests mandatory and passing a baseline before you allowed anywhere near the Wallabies. We can’t afford to have some players on the team they are nothing but lead in the saddle bags. Or to quote Forrest Gump ‘stupid is as stupid does’.
 

Shiggins

Simon Poidevin (60)
no, the penalty had been called first

intention and outcome are not mentioned in the rule.

it was a card every day of the week, and particularly with a northern hemisphere ref.
The injury happend straight away and they looked at it to try and blame someone. They succeeded
 

Dan54

David Wilson (68)
It wasn't intentional his arm goes under the leg.. don't make out like he was trying to damage the knee.. it was dumb but not malicious
Bullshit, it was a shit act, sitting here with an Aussie we jsut watched a replay of it, ne is looking at the knee that is braced and hits it from side.
There was never any other thong but to try and cause injury, I am disappointed that anyone is defending acts like that!
 

Derpus

Nathan Sharpe (72)
Oh sorry sir I charged in a little too chargy on the charge spectrum of ruck and maul charging. Apologies. I will gently engage with gentle carreses next time I decide that a ruck should be engaged upon.
 

dru

David Wilson (68)
Oh sorry sir I charged in a little too chargy on the charge spectrum of ruck and maul charging. Apologies. I will gently engage with gentle carreses next time I decide that a ruck should be engaged upon.

But not too high and not too low. And with both arms. Without one touching a low leg.
 

SteveWA

Charlie Fox (21)
So the ref awards the ABs a try but couldn’t see a grounding? I think alleged try scorer was actually out … great reffing!
How do you know what he saw? We can only see what the cameras show and surely he was in a better position.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top