charlesalan
Sydney Middleton (9)
soon there will be more players on the ground than paying fans
5,283 at Canberra Stadium for Brumbies v Rebels
Just beaten by the lowest ever AFL crowd at the Gabba, 6060 for Suns v Demons and 9,254 at Spotless for GWS v Eagles
Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
Rugby has no relevance for politicians so they don't go to the game. Clearly, Brumbies should have been axed instead of Force
You think the Rebels would have had more chance of making the finals if they had signed all the Brumbies players and coaching staff instead of the Force ones?
Yep that's as good a line up and no snotty nosed Waratahs to ruin things - add in Folau and you've got the wallabies line upMight as well have some fun here and see what that team would of looked like
1. Sio
2. Uelese
3. AAT
4. Parling
5. Arnold
6. Timani
7. Pocock
8. Mafi
9. Genia
10. CLL
11. Koroibete
12. Hodge
13. Kurindrani
14. Speight
15. Maddocks
16. Fainga'a
17. Sa'aga
18. Talaki
19. Carter
20. Fainga'a
21. Powell
22. Hawera
23. English
I'd go out on a limb and say yes. That's a very good team, happy with roster available now so no knock on the current group.
Would be best front row in Australia, best locking pairing, best/extremely balanced back row, CLL to pull the strings on a pack that goes forward, Genia and Powell excellent 1/2 combo, best wings and best centre pairing, with the most talented outside back in the country. Depth is fairly solid
Obviously considering they went to the Rebels and didn't return back home to QLD or NSW
If you are part of the survey group (and you would know about it and have a seperate box) it doesn't matter how you watch it, live/recorded/web/illegal stream - the ratings sample works off audio.Watched the game live on FoxtelNow. Anybody know if and how that gets counted?
Sky Television's viewing figures for April featured three Hurricanes games among the top-four broadcast audiences. That's not bad going when the Sunwolves, who drew 219,000 viewers, and the Sharks (182,000) were among the Hurricanes' opponents.
The most-watched telecast of the month was the Hurricanes' win over the Chiefs, which attracted an audience of 235,000, with the round-five NRL clash between the Warriors and Cowboys (196,000) the only fixture to break up the Hurricanes' domination.
This kiwi stats dwarf those in Australia.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/super-rugby/104208601/television-figures-show-the-hurricanes-are-nzs-most-popular-team\
This kiwi stats dwarf those in Australia.
Assuming that games against us are equally popular, it is pretty obvious why we need to have a Trans-Tasman competition, as a next step.
Assuming that games against us are equally popular, it is pretty obvious why we need to have a Trans-Tasman competition, as a next step.
We got one. Super Rugby. Doesn't work.
You might say -- No, the only thing wrong is the Saffers; just ditch them.
Needs more than that. Betting it all on a Trans-Tasman will screw NZR, as well as the Aussies. They ain't as dumb as Rugby Australia.
Well, from their point of view, … they're alright. Jack.They supported the last expansion of Super Rugby, didn't they? Those clever Kiwis?
Incidentally, there are a few Trans-Tasman comps around.
Soccer, basketball, netball, league to name a few. Would the AFL like to have a New Zealand presence? My bloody oath they would, the silly buggers.