How good is the dialogue in this thread compared to 2013 when players were selected for two camps based on the recommendations of clubs and trusted snouts?
Thompson and Sutherland were at national schools tournaments before that but there were always sniping by pundits that this and that player was overlooked - and I'm talking about Sydney only.
Boy, were we bitching about the horrible system, if it could be described as such?
Pity the young fellows who had a step up in ability since their school days and didn't have a recommendation - or those who were overlooked by the schools system a year or two before, rightly or wrongly, and others got the nod for the first camp in tight calls because of their scrapbook.
Now these blokes have to assessed to get into a local squad. The players from outside the Reds and Tahs have to prove themselves in their squad to go to a tournament in Adelaide. From there the best are assessed in three matches; then a combined squad called the Aus Barbarians Under 20s competes against the Reds and Tahs outfits.
And the players from the two big rugby states get a programme that Ming the Merciless would be proud of, before they get the picked for the nationals.
What a difference; some of us were talking about such a theoretical system back in the day that we thought was pie-in-the-sky.
It is still not perfect: the Country lads from the two big States struggle to get access to a proper selection vehicle and training together has to happen in Adelaide or maybe on a single visit to Brisbane or Sydney beforehand.
But at least they get a shot that they wouldn't have got two years ago.
End of positive rant for the ARU.
.