He looks 15.When was the last time JOC (James O'Connor) played 15?
He looks 15.When was the last time JOC (James O'Connor) played 15?
That's what everyone complained about when Cooper did it.Perhaps we play Beale at 10 in attack and 15 in defense for the counter attack. Not cos were hiding him but cos he is the best option we have at both.
Its just frustrating how some people talk about the force. And i know you a force guy so not having a go at you but people dont treat some of the force boys the way they should be just because of the way the team went eg cummins great all year not given the time of day by most gets a go as last man standing and people now start to pay attention.Settle petal, I forgot about Mafi. He was good.
Cooper was being hidden because he couldn't or wouldn't tackle.That's what everyone complained about when Cooper did it.
Why would it be better for Beale.
Settle petal, I forgot about Mafi. He was good.
That's what everyone complained about when Cooper did it.
Why would it be better for Beale.
When was the last time JOC (James O'Connor) played 15?
Its just frustrating how some people talk about the force. And i know you a force guy so not having a go at you but people dont treat some of the force boys the way they should be just because of the way the team went eg cummins great all year not given the time of day by most gets a go as last man standing and people now start to pay attention.
Sent from my GT-I9300T using Tapatalk 2
I wouldn't mind seeing JOC (James O'Connor) play at fullback. His counter attack could be devastating from there. I still think he's best suited as a 12, but realistically he can play just about anywhere. We could really use him in the team right now.
So. Who else wants to fly over for the test next year?
I have only brought up McCabe because people are suggesting we need Harris for goal kicking. I think Harris is a liability at 15 and not fast enough for wing but that he isn't far behind McCabe at 12. If we absolutely need his kicking then why can't we discuss the possibility of dropping or moving the 'solid' McCabe without being accused of having a 'red agenda'?
Harris is there because he can kick goals, and more inportantly there are nearly half a dozen players ahead of him in the pecking order out injured.
So I think it's a tad silly to talk about him replacing one of the two first choice backs that we still have on the field.
All 3 plus a set of steak knives?wouldn't mind McCabe but the other 2 - no way
Harris is an inside centre at test level and not a fullback or fly-half.. If he is there to kick goals he has to play 12, RD needs to weigh up whether McCabe is contributing enough in attack and defence to offset the difference of Harris goal kicking.
If RD is happy with Beale as kicker then Harris goes to the bench, if he thinks Harris kicking is essential, then he needs to look at moving or benching McCabe.
This is the last ill say in McCabe, because I actually like him, but that is mainly to do with his spirit not his ability.
If we are truly in a period where McCabe is one of the first picked wallabies after playing in the team for little over 12 months and generally being no more than solid, then I think that is an strong reflection of how poor we truly are. If he is undroppable then it is an inditement on Deans' coaching and selections. It appears he is the Reuben Thorne of this team.
I doubt he would be more than third or forth choice 12 for the kiwis yet some think he is undroppable for the wallabies. Really?