Beale was one. Who else?A suspicion of an incipient pot belly on at least 2 (Wallaby) backs.
Can we now call Barnes at 12 a failure? He seems to pull up before hitting the defence.
Worst Australian performance last night was from Phil Kearns.
Marto was second worst.
Seriously the Foxtel Team performance was awful and cringeworthy.
To be considered to have a performance worse than that from the Men in Gold takes some doing, but Foxtel team achieved that distinction.
I could live with that, wj, and if anyone with access to ABC IView wants to see why they should have a look at yesterday's game between Sydney Uni and Manly. They would also see the emerging Wallabies No. 13 in Mitch Inman. With a coach that understands how to use them they are a devastating combination.I think it is unfair to call anyone a failure based on last night. The team failed and that failure was dictated by the opposition.
At some point we have to pick a 12 and stay with it. If every failure means the 12 goes. Then we pretty much only have tom carter left to play.
By the way fellas, what should I eat with my words about Timani, I have bagged him after he got named in team, but thought in last couple of weeks has been one of wallabies best, and looks an international player of quality.
I could live with that, wj, and if anyone with access to ABC IView wants to see why they should have a look at yesterday's game between Sydney Uni and Manly. They would also see the emerging Wallabies No. 13 in Mitch Inman. With a coach that understands how to use them they are a devastating combination.
.
I think you might have a different opinion of your man Inman when you see him next season, Epi.No offence but I doubt the ABs would be having many sleepless nights worrying about that combination, Bruce.
I seriously wonder whether the players have any confidence in the plans coming from the brains trust either. Interesting that they were so quick to spill on what they were trying/ had been told to do. Like the World Cup why spend 3 years developing players who can run the ball (Cooper, JOC (James O'Connor), Beale, Ioane) then play an up and under focussed game plan when none of our players can regather. Can't pick these players and then come up with plans that focus on the weakest parts of their games.All I see page after page of attacks of players, criticizing them for playing to the base level plans that Deans puts out there. Given the base structures that Deans puts in place how the hell can we expect players to perform to their best when they are struggling around as individuals in a group. They are not functioning as a team.
So many here called for massive changes after last week. Well you got them, in base plan and selections. How did the selections this week match up with the plan. As has been said in the interviews the plan was to play territory, so I ask how the F^&% were the selections made in keeping with that plan?
The critique of the players is not a true representation of their abilities when they are trying to perform in a system which does not support their skill set or form a team around them. It is why I ceased doing my "Player Ratings" threads after each game, as I came to realise that so many good players were being tainted and discarded by Deans and Co. because they couldn't perform without some semblance of structure.
The only exception to this rule is those players who have been selected out of form and unfit, but again they shouldn't be in that position in the first place so put the blame where it should lie.