Unfortunatly I am running lines in the frost and dont have much news on saturday.
the big news in cape town this morning is schalk brits having landed this morning from sarries. as much as i'm happy to see him back in super rugby as he is one of the most dynamic forwards playing the game (never thought i'd hear myself saying this about a south african), how can this be allowed, conditional or otherwise?
oom, what are you up to out there?
Only see Brits now in the side, WTF?
indeed what's going on there? not so sure if i agree he should be allowed to play but imagine the impact he can make coming off the bench after 50/60 minutes.
Look like quite a usefull Stormers match 22. Cant go wrong with 5 Paarl Gim Boys in your team, hope they show some real guts on saturday. Only see Brits now in the side, WTF?
The Stormers have been warned - they face major sanctions if strict conditions around their controversial call-up of Schalk Brits for Sunday's Super Rugby semifinal are not adhered to.
The South African side has whistled up the UK-based hooker to fill the void in their loose forward mix for Sunday morning's (3.05am NZT) clash against the Crusaders at Newlands. They have lost Duane Vermeulen, Pieter Louw and Siya Kolisi to injury, and satisfied the ruling body that they did not have sufficient available cover within their wider squad.
Brits has been named on the bench after the Stormers were successful in gaining an exemption from Sanzar to include the Saracens No 2 in their squad despite not fulfilling eligibility criteria under competition regulations.
However the Stormers have been told that Brits has been cleared only on the basis that he is a loose forward cover and that they still had to include two specialist hookers in their squad.
Sanzar chief executive Greg Peters confirmed for Fairfax Media that assurances had been sought and received from the Stormers that they would abide by the conditions of Brits' dispensation, and that any move contrary to the spirit of the agreement would meet with serious consequences.
"We have written undertakings from their CEO, and have written to them stating that these are the conditions with which we're granting it. If they were not to adhere to these conditions we would certainly be taking it up with them," said Peters.
The Crusaders have not been happy that the Stormers were allowed to bring in a player of Brits' standing for a game like this. The tough hooker does have strong links to the region but has been aligned with Saracens since 2009.
"There's nothing that we can do about it," coach Todd Blackadder told media in South Africa. "They've got a dispensation. There can't be any loose forwards left in the Cape to go into the team.
'They're bringing in a marquee player at the business end of the season, but I think that loophole will be closed... Sanzar has to look at it.
"Most of the teams have had to deal with injuries, and they've all coped."
If Brits were to find his way into his specialist hooker position at a crucial stage of the match, then you could imagine the Crusaders would be even more angered.
However Peters repeated his assertion that the South Africans could face major repercussions if they strayed outside the terms of the dispensation.
"We would refer on to a judicial officer to make that decision," said Peters of any sanctions that could arise.
It's understood Sanzar penalties for such a breach could range from a fine to default of the match.
"We're taking their CEO and their team at their word that they will adhere to these conditions," added the Sydney-based Peters.
Current regulations are that for a player to be eligible for finals matches he must have played or been a substitute for no fewer than four regular season games.
But Sanzar retains the right to grant dispensations when no suitable players are available within squads and had done so for a handful of cases prior to Brits, the most notable being Frederic Michalak for the Sharks.
Peters conceded that the eligibility regulation would come under the microscope at season's end.
"It's entirely likely we might put some added parameters around it," added Peters. "We're working with a rule that's been around for a number of years now, and it just happens to have got a bit more focus this year. Now's the time to have a look at it."
However he emphasised that in the case of Brits it was not Sanzar's job to weigh the merits of the player brought in to cover for injuries.
"We don't believe we should get into the subjective argument about who they're applying for," said Peters. "It's about whether they have a need and then declaring the player eligible if we satisfy ourselves there are enough injuries in that position."
Meanwhile Peters said he was not overly concerned by the poor crowd numbers that had become the norm in New Zealand over the second half of the competition.
He said the impact of the Christchurch earthquake, wintry weather, the looming World Cup and some on-field shortcomings had all added up to empty seats at grounds.
"I think we need to look at this year in isolation, take a deep breath and say 'let's build into 2012 with some excitement off the back of the World Cup and look at the situation then'."
Nah I will watch at home tomorrow after this week. had a hectic week of sport and kuier. When you support Boland you know you are in for a hiding off the field aswell.indeed what's going on there? not so sure if i agree he should be allowed to play but imagine the impact he can make coming off the bench after 50/60 minutes. there were some reports of jfourie and duvenage having to sit out training sessions due to injury but i think it's mind games.
got your ticket for the game?