Search results

I’m thinking the Boks coaching staff got covid and they called in Matt Rogers and lote tuquiri to help out

I was about to say something similar but more along the lines of making Phil look like an amateur

How offside was 11 green there. lol

ABs lucky to get away with cynical play? Really?

I get that, that’s not what I was getting at. Eg Kellaway played wearing 11 in his first 5 tests, 14 tonight, and finished the last 2 at fullback, without actually having 15 on his back, and has played most of the last 2 years at 13. That’s more my point. And it’s a BR thing that players...

I admire your assertiveness but you put way too much emphasis on the numbers they wear in provincial rugby.

I don’t think Petaia played his best game, but at the same time he wasn’t awful and Wright comes on with 20 to go against tired opposition and did ok without being spectacular. I doubt there was enough there to change things up.

I think I can work that one out

run that by bulrush

Boks 18 looks like Reece hodge after 50 pies

I hate how black 2 gets a warning but every other team would be instantly penalized for the same thing

The ever reliable ScoBar

My intention wasn’t to launch a full blown investigation into the rights of the TMO, it was a humorous off the cuff comment about this decision. as someone else mentioned there is a common theme about your contribution on these threads so I’m going to leave it alone now. enjoy the game and the...

I’m not blaming anything, I agreed with someone that the TMO should be able to change the decision regardless of the on field one. Especially in a circumstance like that, because it was laughable.

Not dissimilar to Latham. Not as good, but similar traits in this regard.

That might be the case but so far you’re the only one who didn’t see the decision as laughable.

I think he was in the centres? In defence anyway

Problem was he didn’t

How The fuck was 19 blue ruled to be on his feet there??

I need to ask this - is sean Mcmahon on the field?