Search results

Both rugby codes are safer than the AFL. Rugby has more head on collisions, but in the AFL there are some catastrophic prangs. At speed, too.

Just as long as they don't bring Mr Cliches (Greg Clarke) back.

Can't wait.

I really don't have a fixed opinion. Maybe the players should be dealt with on a case by case basis.

Damned if we do and damned if we don't.

I don't necessarily disagree. But I would like to see a bit more of him. He hasn't played many minutes on the big stage.

Smith is going to be the biggest loss.

When has Gleeson played 7?

The Woodies had two Boltes many years ago, Rex and Max. On a more serious note, I hope there will be several bolters. This is the time in the cycle to give 'em a shot at the big time.

Icely? Hooper?

My layman's understanding is that a verbal agreement can be just as enforceable as a written one. RA should get Tony Abrahams onto the case, he was a lawyer in France for some time.

It seems a bit weird to throw money at the mungoes.

Hope he stays with them!

Not really. League and AFL have always been the favoured games for our indigenous brothers and sisters (more recently). That is partly because of the nature of the games themselves, and also that both codes were professional and poor kids could aspire to earn money to help their families: okay...

Something has to be done about cleaning up the breakdown. Stopping jackaling, for a start.

A more pertinent measure of your avidness (sic) is whether you can name more than one club team from the Sydney and Brisbane competitions now. Incidentally, the Sydney competition was televised live on the ABC for many years. The Brisbane comp was advertised too. I recall Friday night games...

Sponsorship depends on the product, not the messenger.

Struth.

If we build a competition that a majority of the possible participants can support we can be successful.

Some do. Some get a lot more.