Search results

His tackling is solid, his defensive decision making needs some work, he isn't crap and Grey will work to have him making better decisions

That would mean Robertson missing and the Tahs finding a LHP (or Tilse) As I said earlier, I would prefer the two, shorter, squatter Robbos starting

This game had the standard metaphor and difference between Aus backlines and Kiwi backlines at the moment At one stage the Force kick and the Chiefs have all worked hard to get back and create many, many options for the receiver. A few moments later reverse is happening and no one had...

Did you? I had the Tahs penciled in as coming in third in the Aus conference, every game we win is a bonus this season

Except for the likes of Weeks, Talakai etc

I don't understand why the Tahs would do such a radical re-shape of the backline, simply stick Carraro or Stewart at 13 rather than moving 15 to 13, 12 to 15 & 22 to 12 and etc etc. Let Folau build a kick return team with Guildford and Robinson

They were doing it to niggle, not injure Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

A bit early to tell, but the decision to try to convert Ryan to LHP does have me scratching my head Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

A certain UK ref would have thrown both in the bin and this site would be having a record day. Both made a choice to do it, being the dominant scrum on the day doesn't give you a free pass Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

The two Robbos should start, they worked hard and locked down most of their scrums, tall props need to be technically gifted to get their angles right, to get any power from the locks. Dennis and Skelton were fine last year with Fatcat and Kepu, we had a solid scrum that could focus pressure...

Here is a hint, when the dominant scrum can't shift the opps and the ball is available at the back, they get the call of "use it" When a dominant scrum does get the opps shifting they get the penalty, sometimes you just have to get on with the game Really? Cynicism? give me a break, that is...

Let us say that if you have the opportunity to drive your opps head into the mud most frontrowers will take that opportunity Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

True, but the jokes about Waugh and the 8,000 scrums on the try line highlight the issue, losing the game but winning the scrum battle means f*ck all

If they do, they better have a very disciplined chase, the Tahs kick return options are back to quite strong With Folau, Robinson, Guildford, Beale & Foley rotating through the back ............................... there isn't a unit there who isn't pretty safe at kick receipt. The bigger...

SMH has Skelton off the bench, Holloway, Robinson and Dempsey starting So ....... Folau Robinson Horne Beale Guildford Foley Phipps Holloway Hooper Dempsey Dennis Mumm So so far so good, then Two average props and Latu

I think this season is going to see a pretty heavy changing of the guard at the Tahs. A number of the old heads have now been there too long and I expect enthusiasm to trump experience.

nup

Even those aren't required to move states or even towns

Incentives yes (often via uni bursaries), forced transfer, no By the players choice, build a decent program and players will want to come

The 2nd time around for the draft in the ARL was supported as well, until Terry Hill decided he didn't want to play for Easts I am simply morally opposed to restrictions of trade like this, a player should have the right to ply is trade where he chooses and not be forced to play elsewhere...