Search results

They will try, then when they've pissed off enough people, they will come crying to the federal government for more money, because people become jaded with tv and resort to streaming. Ratings aren't everything. Time will tell what is in channel nine's "commercial interests".

The anti siphoning laws just need to be scrapped. What were they thinking really. They're just used by networks as a smokescreen to show sport when it suits them and their thinly veiled collusion with pay tv. The law should just say that they can show live sport on whatever channel they choose...

I really feel Deans has to go, I can't stand all this talk about how we should wait and judge on the entire championship. Everyone knows if you sack a coach the team wins the next match, do it now and give us a chance about the Boks. I was all for Deans until the WC where he showed a real lack...

For me, when it comes to sport, being live is the ultimate. Not so long ago analogue tv's with poor reception were not uncommon in pubs and households everywhere. I remember watching the 1991 world cup n a black and white 38cm tv, it was awesome because it was happening live, history was...

The dumb thing is, people are already doing it for free. Network tv will die out while trying to protect their own profits. Everyone needs to evolve, it wasn't long ago that having an internet connection was just for email and assignments.

Couldn't agree more, it's just a load of crap. They use the anti-siphoning laws as a smokescreen to serve their pro league and pro foxtel agenda. The fact that the anti-siphoning laws exist is just retarded in itself, from the moment they were announced I have struggled to see how they are...