Search results

No problem, we get to disagree (and I agree Gits was a great unit) But Foley is the best 10 we have at the moment, well the most consistent unit who will put his body on the line. Over the last two weeks we have watched Foley square up and take the ball to score last week and in that pile of...

I think Foley is a better 10 than Gits, but Gits is the better player but he is a 12

Cheika in the Fox interview talked about the starting squad and the plans to augment that squad as injury replacements happen throughout the tournament

SA teams always get crap crowds and then they play the game near Bathurst

That style would be more helpful if we were playing in the mud & soft grounds of the UK Won't Japan be dry hard tracks? It should lead to some pretty fast running rugby rather box kick death

The wings are being rotated

As you clearly stated, the US model does have minor limitations, but it is still the best model I like Fry's position

The argument in a nut shell

I am OK with it, I may not agree with it, but is the cornerstone of Christian, Muslim & Jewish beliefs, you follow one of the other teams and you ain't going to their version of heaven We seem to want religious people to ignore all the tenants of their beliefs that don't fit into some...

I think he is that "AAC (Adam Ashley-Cooper)" type solid unit that provides a very consistent professional delivery. You need them in a side to balance out those players with greater ups and also downs

And we will see if it was a legal instruction

Well, he is really, it may be polished up and deemed all about the "code of conduct" but in the end it is all about his religious freedom vs a sexuality he believes is wrong and will send them to hell. (A pretty stupid premise, but so are most religious ideas)

Yeah, the question "what value does a HR department provide?" is always an interesting one. When they started bracket creeping into nebulous shit "culture policies" ..............

They may be struggling, but the goal isn't to factor in a percentage of failures at test level, the goal is to hit every lineout

Yeah, nah, it is the core skill, every miss is a failure

He is quite a fan of weekly taking offence by proxy

I am more cynical than you it appears, my impression of large businesses and social conscience/ "codes of conduct" is that they really don't care unless it is going to markedly affect their bottom line

I think, in actuality, it is whether a sponsor may be in any way possibly offended and they are twitchy at the moment about the potential to be twitter mobbed, the rest is window dressing

Whilst in complying with the code of conduct you are correct, it appears we have an unwritten oppression priority criteria within the code whereby sexualty trumps religion. And "likely offensive" is a very tenuous starting point. By whose standards? the offended? or the everyman? or an...

Been thinking about this and I get to disagree. I think there is a bit of chicken and egg in the game plan - and a heavy set of Kiwi expectations through Gibson and Cron on the standards required of a "big" forward. You don't see Kiwi sides carrying big units that don't meet the workrate...