Search results

Then I have no idea who should be 12. Kaplan trialled at 10,and had a severe case of the dropsies,and is very unlikely to be in the 1's from trial form. Ibbotson who you nominate as 12 in the 2's is an outside centre/winger only. Some of the 10's maybe?

Then I have no idea of what point you are making. You write a couple of thousand words myth busting the concept of Sports Scholarships,then you freely admit there are plenty of clipboards, and accept that Schools are out there poaching players?

Don't want to prick your balloon,but I know 2 players listed in your post plus 2 others you don't mention, that were not only approached, but I would almost say pressured in a couple of these cases,into moving Schools. No it wasn't the School that is getting the most criticism in this thread.And...

That depends on the purpose of the trials. Is the primary purpose as a selection trial for further honours (NSW,Oz) Or is it to beat the other Association?

Hang on, People love him because things happen around him,both good and bad. The big difference is in 2011, he would directly contribute to 3 or 4 tries a game.Everyone ignored the 3 or 4 missed tackles and the half a dozen turnovers. Fast forward to 2013, he is still good for those missed...

Cotton was exceptional in the trial. Cochrane is lucky to make the wing on form. McDonald trialled well,and is unlucky not to be in the one's.

lets see if this is closer to the side.