Search results

I believe Flook is the best 13 we have and Henry is the best 12 on current form, but there is always the notion that we pick wallabies first. What the Flook/Henry combination offer is two power games with an excellent kicking game on top.

Also, I think Wilson has been trying a lot harder since the wallabies thing and that often can lead to a few poor plays. I think he is the goods, but needs belief and the more we hear from Eddie, the more belief these guys have to generate in themselves.

Have to say Henry/Flook is preferred. But I understand the Wallaby aspect.

Henry fit for next game. Apparently a broken bone in hand or finger or something hand related.

The backs showed great stuff. Henry looks bloody good and Flook was great also. I think our problem is clearly with the forwards.

Does it matter who exactly has been called to replace people, Or is it infuriating to those in any position that NRL players are going to be called in.

I think that Harry Wilson, Fraser, Isaac Henry etc. have spent their entire sporting life dedicated to union, when they have received multiple offers by league goes to show how dedicated they are and it would be a huge slap in the face to bring in NRL players to replace them. They have probably...

I’d love to see the stats because Henry was in so many breakdowns if I was watching correctly. I can’t see how you wouldn’t have him at 12. Also I’m guessing they will put hunter at 13 with Flook on the wing but I honestly thought the centre pairing of Henry at 12 and Flook at 13 was excellent...