• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

Wallabies 2025

Yoda

Arch Winning (36)
Rugby World Cup

Wales 40 - Wallabies 6

Time Sun, Sep 24, 2023, 3:00 PM
Location: Groupama Stadium
Referee: Wayne Barnes

1 Angus Bell
2 Dave Porecki (c)
3 James Slipper
4 Nick Frost
5 Richie Arnold
6 Rob Leota
7 Tom Hooper
8 Rob Valetini
9 Tate McDermott
10 Ben Donaldson
11 Marika Koroibete
12 Samu Kerevi
13 Jordan Petaia
14 Mark Nawaqanitawase
15 Andrew Kellaway
We were smoked in the forwards that terrible day.
 

Yoda

Arch Winning (36)
Edmed going to the Brums means he will be the Wallabies 10 by the WC. He'll look comfortable in a stable side and we'll all think maybe he's made a leap. To which he will have not.

I'm really wondering how the unknowns around 10 effects the rest of the side. It would be a lot more stable in camp than here but have you ever been in a team where you think "i dn about him" confidence takes a hit but when there is a genuine gun in a spot everyone lifts from it. That's where the likes of Foley and even QC (Quade Cooper) (Quade Cooper) if he was still in competition mode would be effective. You see the old head who's been there done that come in and take charge and you settle into your role.
I recon Declan Meredith will not let that happen old Ghosty.
 

Major Tom

Phil Hardcastle (33)
JOC (James O'Connor) (James O'Connor) to start is absolutely zero chance. Joe will stick with Donno, Lynagh and Edmed in that order. That's who he's been backing and I'm pretty confident that's exacfly who he will pick. The only other possibility is Foley as a mentor in squad but don't see it happening. Brumby Runner, although I think Meredith is handy I think you are dreaming if you think Joe would call him into the Wallabies after one game against the Lions.
Agreed. HMP has a better shot than Meredith and hes not picking him either
 

emuarse

Chilla Wilson (44)
There's an interesting article in The Roar, regarding the Wallabies poor defence. <https://www.theroar.com.au/2025/07/...d-what-has-happened-to-the-wallabies-defence/>.
I have to agree with this ascertion that our line speed in defence is poor, and that if the Wallabies keep hanging back, then the series will be lost.
Hoping Laurie sees the error in his ways as the defence coach, and takes a more agressive approach.
I do believe for selection of the backs with defence in mind, that we should have the following back line for my reasoning given:
Flyhalf: Tom Lynaugh - for me, he is the one player that has the natural abilities for that position, and he can actually tackle.
Inside Centre: Hunter Paisami - he does like to rush up in defence, and hits hard. Also half three quarters is his natural position.
Outside Centre: Len Ikitau - arguably currently the best outside centre in the world, so why play him out of position.
Wingers: Max Jorgensen - played with his speed in defence; a natural winger
: Harry Potter - has great mindset to be in the right place at the right time.
Fullback: Joseph-Aukuso Sua'ali'i - well you might say Tom Wright, but this is a complex situation. I believe JAS is more a naturally gifted full back than Wright, and he looked a bit lost in the 13 position against Fiji; whereas he has played in the Super Pacific competition as full back for the Waratahs, so has more experience there. He is better in one-on-one tackle defence than Wright, and is naturally gifted at receiving kicks, of which there will be a lot. And finally because, as stated above, Ikitau should be playing at 13.
 
Last edited:

Wilson

Tim Horan (67)
The last thing I want to see is the Wallabies tossing out their defensive system less than 2 weeks before the Lions first test, particularly for one that none of the coaching team responsible (Schmidt and Fisher in particular) have never really been proponents of.
 

Tazzmania

Dave Cowper (27)
Flyhalf: Tom Lynaugh - for me, he is the one player that has the natural abilities for that position, and he can actually tackle.
Not sure if this "Roar"contributor checked the stats first.

I am led to believe that according to AI in super rugby a tackle completion rate of 85% is considered to be good.

Tom Lynaugh for 2025 Super Rugby 68/86 that makes 79%.
 

emuarse

Chilla Wilson (44)
I saw the headline but I tend to ignore any analysis from The Roar's "rookie" contributors, who I believe are just some randoms who frequent their comments sections, particularly when their "experts" attempts are often not up to scratch...

So I read this one, and I should've stuck with my initial instincts...
Your remarks are very opinionated, without any meaningful contribution. I would not have referred it if I didn't agree with the slow defence from the Wallabies. Also, I've come across similiar criticism from other posters who have also supplied reasoning.
 

Slim 293

George Smith (75)
Your remarks are very opinionated, without any meaningful contribution. I would not have referred it if I didn't agree with the slow defence from the Wallabies. Also, I've come across similiar criticism from other posters who have also supplied reasoning.

My other problem with the article is that after offering absolutely no real insight into the Wallabies' defensive system, it then ends with a few paragraphs praising Paisami whose defensive misreads last year created overlaps for the Wallabies' wider channels...
 

emuarse

Chilla Wilson (44)
Not sure if this "Roar"contributor checked the stats first.

I am led to believe that according to AI in super rugby a tackle completion rate of 85% is considered to be good.

Tom Lynaugh for 2025 Super Rugby 68/86 that makes 79%.
79% from a flyhalf would be considered a high pass mark. Did you also use AI to check on other Aussi flyhalves?
Chat GPT supplies the following info:

Ben Donaldson (Western Force)​


Ben Donaldson's tackle completion rate for the 2025 Super Rugby Pacific season was approximately 55%, which is below the benchmark of 85% considered good for tackle efficiency. rugbypass.com




Tane Edmed (NSW Waratahs)​


Tane Edmed made 24 tackles over 518 minutes of play, with a tackle completion rate of 71%. This rate is below the 85% benchmark.




Noah Lolesio (ACT Brumbies)​


Specific tackle completion statistics for Noah Lolesio during the 2025 Super Rugby Pacific season are not readily available in the provided sources. However, as a fly-half, his primary responsibilities are often centered around playmaking and kicking, with defensive duties being less emphasized compared to other positions.
 

Hogan

Sydney Middleton (9)
Donaldson and Lynagh will be the Wallaby 10’s moving forward whilst Noah recovers from injury. And to be honest they’ll do just as good a job if not better than Lolesio imo. Both have more distance in their kicking games and offer more in attack than Noah. As Steve Larkham was quoted as saying yesterday…“They haven’t had the chance to cement their position for long enough. Unlike a seasoned Test player like Finn Russell who has had time in the seat, we haven’t had the guys who’ve had time in the seat.” Maybe now it’s their time.
 

Tazzmania

Dave Cowper (27)
79% from a flyhalf would be considered a high pass mark. Did you also use AI to check on other Aussi flyhalves?
I already knew what the others were but the Roar poster did not say he was good compared to the others he said HE CAN ACTUALLY TACKLE.

Note: Slim's stats are more acurate than the ones you quoted

Stats I have:

TL 68/86 (79%) (742 minutes) [8.6 minutes between tackles]

BD 58/80 (73%) (988 minutes) [12.35 minutes between tackles]
NL 41/51 (80%) (732 minutes) [14.35 minuts between tackles]
TE 24/29 (83%) (516 minutes) [17.79 minutes between tackles]

So yes TL may be a better tackler than the other flyhalf options, but not sure "HE CAN ACTUALLY TACKLE" is validated.

Unfortunately the stats cannot account for the stregnth of the team you play for v the opposition.
 
Last edited:

The Red Baron

Chilla Wilson (44)
There's an interesting article in The Roar, regarding the Wallabies poor defence. <https://www.theroar.com.au/2025/07/...d-what-has-happened-to-the-wallabies-defence/>.
I have to agree with this ascertion that our line speed in defence is poor, and that if the Wallabies keep hanging back, then the series will be lost.
Hoping Laurie sees the error in his ways as the defence coach, and takes a more agressive approach.
I do believe for selection of the backs with defence in mind, that we should have the following back line for my reasoning given:
Flyhalf: Tom Lynaugh - for me, he is the one player that has the natural abilities for that position, and he can actually tackle.
Inside Centre: Hunter Paisami - he does like to rush up in defence, and hits hard. Also half three quarters is his natural position.
Outside Centre: Len Ikitau - arguably currently the best outside centre in the world, so why play him out of position.
Wingers: Max Jorgensen - played with his speed in defence; a natural winger
: Harry Potter - has great mindset to be in the right place at the right time.
Fullback: Joseph-Aukuso Sua'ali'i - well you might say Tom Wright, but this is a complex situation. I believe JAS is more a naturally gifted full back than Wright, and he looked a bit lost in the 13 position against Fiji; whereas he has played in the Super Pacific competition as full back for the Waratahs, so has more experience there. He is better in one-on-one tackle defence than Wright, and is naturally gifted at receiving kicks, of which there will be a lot. And finally because, as stated above, Ikitau should be playing at 13.

Without critiquing anything else, there's an issue straight away with playing Paisami in that backline in the current system. The idea of hanging back is to present a wall to the attacker, which requires the whole defensive line to be connected. The second Paisami rushes up for a big hit, the system will fall apart.

Second, why you would want to bench one of the best attacking backs we have in Wright and put Sua'ali'i at fullback, particularly when he's been training at outside centre since he got into Wallabies camp and has formed a combo with Ikitau, is beyond me. If we're worried about his positioning and reading at 13, how is putting him at 15 going to solve that problem?

I think I'll pass on that article thanks.
 

Sword of Justice

Alan Cameron (40)
I already knew what the others were but the Roar poster did not say he was good compared to the others he said HE CAN ACTUALLY TACKLE.

Note: Slim's stats are more acurate than the ones you quoted

Stats I have:

TL 68/86 (79%) (742 minutes) [8.6 minutes between tackles]

BD 58/80 (73%) (988 minutes) [12.35 minutes between tackles]
NL 41/51 (80%) (732 minutes) [14.35 minuts between tackles]
TE 24/29 (83%) (516 minutes) [17.79 minutes between tackles]

So yes TL may be a better tackler than the other flyhalf options, but not sure "HE CAN ACTUALLY TACKLE" is validated.

Unfortunately the stats cannot account for the stregnth of the team you play for v the opposition.
I’m more interested in the number of tackles and minutes which supports my impression that Lynagh is in the line a lot more than the other 10s. I think that validates that he can actually tackle.
 

Tomthumb

Ken Catchpole (46)
I’m more interested in the number of tackles and minutes which supports my impression that Lynagh is in the line a lot more than the other 10s. I think that validates that he can actually tackle.
Whether you want your First five making all those tackles is more the question
 
Top