All this about GPS being sore losers and CAS had the better side, only the latter is true. It is correct that CAS (and perhaps ISA) fielded a better team, that beat GPS fair & square. But the most common reason found is the mishap of selection, but people are saying this is just arrogant GPS BS. It’s not.
YES, CAS had the better team, but IMO this is largely because of whatever happened in picking this GPS team. I’m sure the game would have been tight, and definitely not GPS domination but I feel that a win for the GPS could have been found in what was lost in mis-selection. Some errors in selection are clear as day. This is not GPS arrogance or sore-losering, this is an understandable justification for underperformance.