LeCheese
Geoff Shaw (53)
WilsonIf edmed were to go down in the first 10 minutes would you send Stewart or Loneragon on?
WilsonIf edmed were to go down in the first 10 minutes would you send Stewart or Loneragon on?
That's an option WSilson, but if it happens then Harry doesn't add to the quality of the team off the bench. A backrow of Valetini, Tizzano and Wilson is all round stronger than CDC, Tizzano and Wilson.More likely than not Harry comes on for Valetini. That's the way Joe has run just about every game of his tenure, outside of injury injuey enforced changes. Game situation may change that a bit, but I'd expect it's still plan A.
No. I am happy with Bell starting and Ross off the bench. My comment was that Ross does not improve the team when Bell leaves. He is not a better all round player than Angus Bell. I expect Bell might be looking at long minutes in this game.Did you want bell off the bench? I’m not sure who you would have instead of Ross. Clearly our 2nd best LHP now that slipper has retired. This if clearly not our best team but not that bad either.
The point of it generally seems to be to give Valetini license to go all out for 60 or so, rather than having to pace himself. It also looks to be why the partnerships have always been work rate back rows with Valetini, with a guy like Gleeson only really getting a chance to start when Valetini was out. At the 60 minute mark I think you are getting a fair bit more out of a fresh Wilson than a tired Valetini in an impact role. Yes, you can say the same about Wilson over CdC from minute 1-80, but the idea is that CdC is there to do the work, not blow the game open, and in that role there is much less decline across the 80 (assuming his fitness is good enough).That's an option WSilson, but if it happens then Harry doesn't add to the quality of the team off the bench. A backrow of Valetini, Tizzano and Wilson is all round stronger than CDC, Tizzano and Wilson.
Who takes over the goal kicking if/when Edmed leaves? I suppose Kellaway has some form? But none of Lonergan, Stewart or Kellaway are first choice kickers at Super level if I'm not mistaken.If edmed were to go down in the first 10 minutes would you send Stewart or Loneragon on?
Stewart is a reasonable but not great kicker. I imagine the order will be Lonergan, Stewart, Daugunu, Kellaway depending on who is on the field.Who takes over the goal kicking if/when Edmed leaves? I suppose Kellaway has some form? But none of Lonergan, Stewart or Kellaway are first choice kickers at Super level if I'm not mistaken.
I’m not sure why you’re complaining about something that can’t be controlled then? I also don’t think the front row will be the issue as such. Ross will be fine against their front row. Honestly, we should pump them based off who’s in the team. It’s simply the number of changes that may make things interesting for us. But we haven’t played for a number of weeks so it’s not like it’s that much of a disruption. Backs are a bit small with JAS but getting Pietch back is very handy. I would have preferred that Carter off the bench (instead of Stewart) or played last weekend for Aus XV.No. I am happy with Bell starting and Ross off the bench. My comment was that Ross does not improve the team when Bell leaves. He is not a better all round player than Angus Bell. I expect Bell might be looking at long minutes in this game.
Finishing Schmidt’s mandatoryWhere's our new Hope? Carter Gordon?
He can also ask Flook and Kellaway to step in to do a bit of distributing.
Flook has been a lot of things in his pro rugby career but surely he’s got no real experience playing in a distribution role? If that’s an option, we would be cooked.
I would say that Pietch will be in the frame over Potter.Looks like a team picked to keep the majority of the XV for England fresh.
Robertson
Pollard
AAA / Tupou
Frost
LSL (Lukhan Salakaia-Loto) (Lukhan Salakaia-Loto)
Valetini
McReight
Wilson
Gordon
Edmed
Jorgenson
Paisami
JAS
Potter
Kellaway
So if Edmed does his hammy in the 1st minute, we get 79 mins of Hamish Stewart at 10 in a Test match?