WLF3
Billy Sheehan (19)
Goose, appreciate your input but not the case. Keep your house.Bet the house they’d all jump ship
Goose, appreciate your input but not the case. Keep your house.Bet the house they’d all jump ship
Scholarships aren’t approved by the heads of rugby they’re done by the schools board. I don’t think their priority is about winning comps but you make a lot of very valid points, scholarships are hard on those who get dropped down but that doesn’t mean it’s impossible to gain selection. Lots of these boys just change positionsSorry, you guys should stop this smoke screen of Holier than though ( and I am not religious).
In most cases Rugby Scholarships are offered for 1 purpose, and 1 purpose only, to win the comp.
If we need to be honest these boys who come in very late, typically aren't ATAR boys, they may do the ATAR but that's probably because they have been told to, a few may be different. What you seem to conveniently miss is the MASSIVE collateral damage that this does to boys who have been at the school for many years, been in the As or Bs (so trained their arses off) just to get bumped at the last most important turn (devastating). Also if you assume the boys who have been at a school for years have parents who are automatically loaded that is often NOT the case, the truth is they work hard to do it.
BTW, my view of a strong Rugby school is it's performance and depth across the ages, not just the1sts, everyone can see through that one.
Scholarships aren’t approved by the heads of rugby they’re done by the schools board. I don’t think their priority is about winning comps
They do indeed Snort. My error in an earlier post.Incidentally, not to talk about the actual games or anything, but I gather Trinity plays St Pius this weekend, not St Gregs.
Is it not snobby to send a C's team to get towelled up by a B's team 100-0? When their B's team would get smoked as well. Why would you want parents travelling all the way to sport to see their team lose 100-0 when this could be avoided?You and Hornsby4life spend your time putting crap on Joeys and the GPS comp and promoting Barker to the death. What do you expect? Do you think that everyone in the GPS will stand beside you and think, “oh, ok that’s right, we are the problem, Barker deserve to be revered as the best there ever was,,,”
I find it thought provoking how close you propose the barker vs New game- this will be fascinating.Agreed. I think after the Auggies game Cranbrook will need to change some things, and they will be looking for a win.
On another note here are my tips for the weekend:
View to beat Wav, 21-7
Knox to beat Shore, 35-5
Barker to beat New, 10-7
Stannies to beat Aloys in the wooden spoon matchup, a high scoring affair, 28-27
Trinity to beat Gregs, 50-28
Hi Woodville,I find it thought provoking how close you propose the barker vs New game- this will be fascinating.
With regards Knox I feel an obliteration coming on.
Aloys vs Stannies is 50/50 I reckon, can I get some thoughts from everyone else on this matchup?
I think we get what you're' saying and this sort of scheduling shouldn't happen with schools like Waverly & Knox who have depth below As. View playing St Gregs on Saturday also would be the reason. Can only think the logic is View C v Wav B is potentially better than St Gregs A playing View C.Is it not snobby to send a C's team to get towelled up by a B's team 100-0? When their B's team would get smoked as well. Why would you want parents travelling all the way to sport to see their team lose 100-0 when this could be avoided?
Not really, we are talking about a team made up of Rugby League players compared to a team that won 50-0 against another GPS B's side last week.I think we get what you're' saying and this sort of scheduling shouldn't happen with schools like Waverly & Knox who have depth below As. View playing St Gregs on Saturday also would be the reason. Can only think the logic is View C v Wav B is potentially better than St Gregs A playing View C.
Greetings Doggies,Hi Woodville,
Re your Aloys vs Stannies comments, I've heard huge things pending from Aloys and would love to see them get a couple more wins going into CAS. My prediction is a tight game with Aloys coming through the winner at the end.
I also agree with your comments about Knox.
Best of luck to all the CAS boys.
- Doggies.
Similar thing is happening in other age groups as well. View 16Cs are playing Waverly Bs.Not really, we are talking about a team made up of Rugby League players compared to a team that won 50-0 against another GPS B's side last week.
Hi Walshy81,Hey Fanatic, I get it. Let's hope Cranbrook sort that out. Maybe Auggies defence was/is very good.
Any idea who Cranbrook play on 27 May in the last trial - CAS website still has Auggies listed, but obviously that's no longer the case.
I have no idea if Gregs have a good team or not. Maybe they are more competitive than we are giving just a team of league players credit. (Something people use to say about Waverly)
I think both sides are very strong this year and it will be very interesting to see how this plays out. As New had a strong 16as last year, and now Barker have lost some key players who have graduated. I still think Barker will win, but it will be a great game.I find it thought provoking how close you propose the barker vs New game- this will be fascinating.
With regards Knox I feel an obliteration coming on.
Aloys vs Stannies is 50/50 I reckon, can I get some thoughts from everyone else on this matchup?
4 new debutants for the waves this week v view
Yes, 16s and 2XV getting call ups at trainingAre these as a result of injury?
Are these as a result of injury?
How may of these replacements are 16s?Yes, 16s and 2XV getting call ups at training
I think 3, maybe 2How may of these replacements are 16s?
I think 3, maybe 2