Frogs were behind for the entire match yesterday. Didnt pip them till the last couple of minutesFrance get to have the easiest series out of everyone in Japan and go top.
Bigger impact is the difference between the teams. The Wales win has caused the most commotionThe way the ranking calculations work, it's double points for an away win. So for Australia and NZ to stay static to where they were before the series started, both now must win the final game. Speaking generally, to get a points advantage out of the series you have to win all 3.
Against South Africa A lolThe Wales win has caused the most commotion
The way the ranking calculations work, it's double points for an away win. So for Australia and NZ to stay static to where they were before the series started, both now must win the final game. Speaking generally, to get a points advantage out of the series you have to win all 3.
The Argentina/Scotland one confuses me too - firstly the largest movement is capped at +/- 2.00, they are both 2.01. Secondly, the teams were ranked 7th and 8th respectively, so regardless of the 15 point threshold I’m not sure why the result would deserve the maximum fluctuation (c.f. the Wales v SAF result which clearly does deserve it).
Mind you, these aren’t the official moves, but I’ve never seen this site be wrong.
It's not quite. If teams were equal on ranking points heading into a match, the home team can get 7/13 of the points the away team can get for the reverse result. For a match decided by 1-15 points, the +/- of the movement between the home and away winner will add to 2 and if they were level on points the home team winning moves ranking points by 0.70 and the away team winning moves it by 1.30.
1-15 is capped at 2.00. 16+ is capped at 3.00.