• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

Wallabies unfit?

Status
Not open for further replies.

gone

Ted Fahey (11)
Anybody think there is truth behind this?

From Rugbyheaven written by the Greek Kiwi:

Don't despair - fitter Wallabies might rise from last in Tri Nations rankings SPIRO ZAVOS
June 29, 2010
.The famed Australian writer Tom Keneally once described the intense build-up to a big sporting occasion as the foreplay before the climatic event itself is played out. The June Tests in Australia, South Africa and New Zealand, in this context, can be seen as the foreplay for the real rugby thing of the Tri Nations series.

I've sometimes suggested that the Tri Nations is harder to win than the World Cup. There is an element of exaggeration in this in that by definition only three nations can win the Tri Nations. And, in theory, the 20 nations competing in a World Cup tournament can win it. In fact, only one nation outside of the Tri Nations powers has won a World Cup. That was England in 2003. And in that year, England did not have to defeat the All Blacks. South Africa won the 2007 RWC tournament without defeating either the Wallabies or the All Blacks. But to win the Tri Nations one of the teams has to defeat the other two national sides, the strongest sides in world rugby.

Even allowing for the loss through injury of their incomparable halfback Fourie du Preez, one of the greatest players in the history of rugby in my view, the Springboks on the evidence of their June Tests results might be even stronger this season than they were last year.

The All Blacks are a side in transition. Their squad contains six players who made their Test debut this season. Many of these new players have the X-factor, those dynamic skills bring match-breaking plays to their game. The issue for the All Blacks is whether these X-factor players, such as Israel Dagg, Victor Vito and Rene Ranger, can be fitted into the playing squad and then perform at Test level.

This brings us to the Wallabies. There was a splendid victory at Perth when the back line ripped England apart virtually every time they ran the ball. But the two Tests after Perth, the loss to England in Sydney and the victory over Ireland in Brisbane, showed a Wallabies side that lacks mongrel and ball-running in the forwards, and coherence and effective finishing in the backs. On the strength or, more accurately, the weakness of these last two performances there can be no argument with Robbie Deans's assessment that "we are still the third-ranked side" in the Tri Nations tournament.

There is justifiable doom and gloom about the chances of the Wallabies improving on this ranking. But the Australian way is to be optimistic in the spirit of the goldminers forever expecting that "flash in the pan" to rescue a bleak situation. One flash is that the Wallabies conditioning coach will monitor the entire squad with GPS tracking devices that will record the intensity of their training. It is an open secret that many Waratahs and Brumbies players shirked their full training obligations in the Super 14. An unfortunate feature of the Wallabies, this season and last season, has been the way they have faded in the second half of Test matches. A fitter Wallabies team might convert those half-time leads to full-time victories.

A second flash is the Reds factor. The Queensland side opted for a high-speed and high-skills style run by the brilliant halves Will Genia and Quade Cooper. A fully fit Genia, later in the Tri Nations, will give Cooper, the star of this year, the space to put into action the Reds' high-octane game for a fit Wallabies. When the Wallabies squad is announced on Thursday, too, some of the Reds who missed out on selection for the first 2010 squad should be included. It needs to be remembered that the Reds defeated the top three South African teams in the Super 14 and thrashed the Crusaders as well.

Is there a Reds dawn for the Wallabies in all of this?

spiro@theroar.com.au

If you back at the tests against the All Blacks the last 2 years, without checking I think we have led at halftime in all but one of them only to fade in the 2nd half. Looking also at the schedule the Wallabies have had over the last month with some players playing 2 games a week and more generally the squad as a whole getting very little downtime, is Robbie just trying to improve the fitness?

If the above is true it doesn't reflect on Hickey or Friend...
 

naza

Alan Cameron (40)
Anybody think there is truth behind this?

No.

That's almost as bad an effort as Tim Horan
“Rocky played a bit better on Saturday night but he’s got to start standing up,” Horan said on Monday.

“We haven’t seen him wide at all.

“I think he’s got to be standing wide and standing out in the centres and running at opposition centres and get the off-load away.

I do wonder how exactly blokes like Horan, Growden and Zavos have jobs commenting on rugby.
 

Lee Grant

John Eales (66)
The inability of the Wallabies to last a whole game even when they start well is well known, and it goes back a few years. It is one of the constants of our inconsistency since 2001.

It used to be the other way around and we finished stronger than our peer opponents.

It's not just fitness of body - fitness of mind is a huge area which is not discussed much. We need more players who are mentally tough because we have only a few of them.
 

Reddy!

Bob Davidson (42)
Yeh I agree Lee, at this level the general level of physical fitness is pretty even. And seems like the Wallabies take it seriously as they are implementing GPS trackers to keep tabs on the distance and speed at which they run during training.
 

liquor box

Peter Sullivan (51)
The inability of the Wallabies to last a whole game even when they start well is well known, and it goes back a few years. It is one of the constants of our inconsistency since 2001.

It used to be the other way around and we finished stronger than our peer opponents.

It's not just fitness of body - fitness of mind is a huge area which is not discussed much. We need more players who are mentally tough because we have only a few of them.

When we were better at the end of the games did we use as many subs? We seem to use the bench without need and when we bring on 3 new forwards and a hooker we usually lose the next lineout and then conced points. When TPN came off the bench we seemed to lose about 95% of our first throw in, he would not even get to touch the ball in "game time" and his first touch of the ball would be a throw.

I think that the change of players is confusing to the players left on the ground and disrupts any control of the game we had. I am all for replacing injured players but we just change too much.

Can anyone recall the "old days" and tell me if there were as many subs?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top