Bullrush
Geoff Shaw (53)
Ah yes....when your case is strong and persuasive that one turns to ad hominemsNot my fault you have the intellect of a prepubescent child
Ah yes....when your case is strong and persuasive that one turns to ad hominemsNot my fault you have the intellect of a prepubescent child
Well feel free to give the actual numbers to justify the claim of 'huge numbers'....*sigh*
I see you're just going to descend into your usual schtick of being a disingenuous troll...
Do you think all those kids would be so keen on playing league is the Storm were shit?
Well they chose the Rebels and union over the Storm and as you are so keen to remind everyone the Rebels were not successful. It is the significant financial investment that the NRL is putting into the grassroots that is winning the battleDo you think all those kids would be so keen on playing league is the Storm were shit?
How did 'growing to greatness' work out?This isn’t about the Rebels, it’s about the fact shrinking to greatness doesn’t work. We can look directly at the results of cutting to Force.
Especially when your biggest rivals are growing
Right....you don't think kids are attracted to the team that is winning premierships as opposed to the team that celebrates 5 wins from 14 as their best ever?Well they chose the Rebels and union over the Storm and as you are so keen to remind everyone the Rebels were not successful. It is the significant financial investment that the NRL is putting into the grassroots that is winning the battle
Tell me why shrinking to greatness will work now when it didn’t 5 years ago. At a time where talented juniors are in even higher demand from other codes.How did 'growing to greatness' work out?
Well feel free to give the actual numbers to justify the claim of 'huge numbers'....
*sigh*
I see you're just going to descend into your usual schtick of being a disingenuous troll...
Ah yes....when your case is strong and persuasive that one turns to ad hominems
Obviously they weren’t as we had 20 years of the Storm winning with union being the dominant participation code of rugby in the state. How is that possible if the Storm are so attractive because they are winning premiership?Right....you don't think kids are attracted to the team that is winning premierships as opposed to the team that celebrates 5 wins from 14 as their best ever?
I'm told it was 3 on the weekend.
Also...
I'm told it was 3 on the weekend.
So I googled "wallaby players from victoria" and from Rugby Victoria's own website there were:
36 in total
6 in the last 20 years
3 since the Rebels
What should I google next?
Victorian Wallabies | Rugby Victoria
vic.rugby
disingenuous
There were 4 that played this season all from the Quinn’s not on that list, Pete Samu not on that list.I'm told it was 3 on the weekend.
So I googled "wallaby players from victoria" and from Rugby Victoria's own website there were:
36 in total
6 in the last 20 years
3 since the Rebels
What should I google next?
Victorian Wallabies | Rugby Victoria
vic.rugby
Good for you.@Bullrush what understanding of the sporting landscape do you have in Victoria? As I have played multiple sports here coached and volunteered at multiple clubs. I am not interested in your thoughts on the Rebels and their success or lack of it. Yet it is painful obviously that you’re not qualified to comment on the state of grassroots sports in this state
I have been talking about pathways and the challenges the game faces. Not once have I said in this thread that they should be re-instated.Good for you.
I'm talking about the Rebels because this is the Super Rugby 2025 thread and you keep bringing them up , for what reason I'm not sure because they won't be in it.
I ask for the number
You tell me to 'google it'
I give you the google results
I'm disingenuous
Why don't you just and be honest say that you don't know what the number is either....